On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 02:29:28PM +0100, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:24:58PM +0100, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> > Interestingly, that paints a completely different picture. I added
> > that line to two machines (guard+exit) and after a few minutes :
> >
> > # cat /var/lib/t
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:24:58PM +0100, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> Interestingly, that paints a completely different picture. I added
> that line to two machines (guard+exit) and after a few minutes :
>
> # cat /var/lib/tor/node*/infolog | grep Negotiated | awk '{ print $8
> }' | sort | uniq -d
Philipp Winter schreef op 12/01/15 om 20:14:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 06:57:01PM +0100, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
23% is a lot though - so high that I really doubt it's true. The
ratios between handshakes and deduplicated handshakes is also rather
strange. Is there anything we can do to the datas
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 06:57:01PM +0100, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> 23% is a lot though - so high that I really doubt it's true. The
> ratios between handshakes and deduplicated handshakes is also rather
> strange. Is there anything we can do to the dataset to find out why
> the amount is so high
David Fifield schreef op 12/01/15 om 18:46:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 06:26:14PM +0100, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
On 12 Jan 2015, at 16:25, Philipp Winter wrote:
Versions | Amount total | Amount w/o duplicate hosts
-+---+---
1 and 2 | 34,648 (
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 06:26:14PM +0100, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> > On 12 Jan 2015, at 16:25, Philipp Winter wrote:
> > Versions | Amount total | Amount w/o duplicate hosts
> > -+---+---
> > 1 and 2 | 34,648 (9%) | 21,552 (23%)
>
> We debugge
> On 12 Jan 2015, at 16:25, Philipp Winter wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 03:38:28PM +0100, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
>> After reading the Tor spec [1] I did some digging and realized that
>> the old handshakes and link protocols (v1 (certs up-front) and v2
>> (renegotiation)) are not used
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 04:25:56PM +0100, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 03:38:28PM +0100, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> > After reading the Tor spec [1] I did some digging and realized that
> > the old handshakes and link protocols (v1 (certs up-front) and v2
> > (renegotiation)) ar
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 03:38:28PM +0100, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> After reading the Tor spec [1] I did some digging and realized that
> the old handshakes and link protocols (v1 (certs up-front) and v2
> (renegotiation)) are not used anymore as of 0.2.3.6-alpha which
> introduced link proto v3.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
>>Now, maybe we _should_ drop support for versions before
>> 0.2.3.17-beta as well. If so, we can rip out even more code. (And
>> that might be a good idea.) What do people on the list think?
X Fabio:
X The cleaner, the better!
> I
Nick Mathewson schreef op 02/01/15 om 15:27:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tom van der
Woerdt wrote:
Sounds good!
I spent some time writing a patch that removes v1 of the link protocol from
both the server and client, and so far it seems to work nicely: the code
compiles nicely, all test c
On 1/2/15 3:27 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Now, maybe we _should_ drop support for versions before
> 0.2.3.17-beta as well. If so, we can rip out even more code. (And
> that might be a good idea.) What do people on the list think?
The cleaner, the better!
Fabio
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tom van der
Woerdt wrote:
>
> Sounds good!
>
> I spent some time writing a patch that removes v1 of the link protocol from
> both the server and client, and so far it seems to work nicely: the code
> compiles nicely, all test cases pass, and the resulting binary ha
Nick Mathewson schreef op 29/12/14 om 00:50:
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
Hi all,
After reading the Tor spec [1] I did some digging and realized that the old
handshakes and link protocols (v1 (certs up-front) and v2 (renegotiation))
are not used anymore as of 0.2.
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After reading the Tor spec [1] I did some digging and realized that the old
> handshakes and link protocols (v1 (certs up-front) and v2 (renegotiation))
> are not used anymore as of 0.2.3.6-alpha which introduced link proto v
Hi all,
After reading the Tor spec [1] I did some digging and realized that the
old handshakes and link protocols (v1 (certs up-front) and v2
(renegotiation)) are not used anymore as of 0.2.3.6-alpha which
introduced link proto v3.
Supporting v1 and v2 requires (among other things) supportin
16 matches
Mail list logo
