-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/20/2015 04:36 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists wrote:
>
>
> On 5/19/15 4:43 PM, Jeremy Rand wrote:
>> Hello Tor-Dev,
>>
>> One of the criticisms of Namecoin which seems to be raised
>> sometimes is that the current domain namespace spec
On 5/19/15 4:43 PM, Jeremy Rand wrote:
> Hello Tor-Dev,
>
> One of the criticisms of Namecoin which seems to be raised
> sometimes is that the current domain namespace spec doesn't have a
> method for a .bit domain owner to prove that they are in control of
> a .onion. (This is also an issue for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/19/2015 03:31 PM, OnioNS Dev wrote:
>
>
>> On 05/19/2015 10:02 AM, Daniel Martí wrote:
>>> I'm not familiar with Namecoin, but I thought I'd just point
>>> out that someone will be working on OnioNS, the onion name
>>> system, as part of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> On 05/19/2015 10:02 AM, Daniel Martí wrote:
>> I'm not familiar with Namecoin, but I thought I'd just point out
>> that someone will be working on OnioNS, the onion name system, as
>> part of the SoP in Tor. The person who will be working on it j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/19/2015 10:02 AM, Daniel Martí wrote:
> I'm not familiar with Namecoin, but I thought I'd just point out
> that someone will be working on OnioNS, the onion name system, as
> part of the SoP in Tor. The person who will be working on it just
> s
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:43:30 -0500, Jeremy Rand wrote:
> One of the criticisms of Namecoin which seems to be raised sometimes
> is that the current domain namespace spec doesn't have a method for a
> .bit domain owner to prove that they are in control of a .onion.
> (This is also an issue for .
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Tor-Dev,
One of the criticisms of Namecoin which seems to be raised sometimes
is that the current domain namespace spec doesn't have a method for a
.bit domain owner to prove that they are in control of a .onion.
(This is also an issue for .bi
