On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:24 PM wrote:
FWIW, this proposal is now in the repository. Let's do the pending
changes as patches on what's there now.
--
Nick
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
Hi Nick,
> On 3 Aug 2019, at 01:25, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:24 PM wrote:
>>
>> Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
>>
>> I have a new proposal: A Tor Implementation of IPv6 Happy Eyeballs
>>
>> This is to implement Tor IPv6 Happy Eyeballs and acts as an alternative
>> to
Hi i am a new partner in tor-dev can you help me te understand the stuffs
here
Le 2 août 2019 16:25, "Nick Mathewson" a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:24 PM wrote:
> >
> > Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
> >
> > I have a new proposal: A Tor Implementation of IPv6 Happy Eyeballs
> >
> > This is
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:24 PM wrote:
>
> Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
>
> I have a new proposal: A Tor Implementation of IPv6 Happy Eyeballs
>
> This is to implement Tor IPv6 Happy Eyeballs and acts as an alternative
> to Prop299 as requested here:
>
Hi,
> On 2 Aug 2019, at 13:02, NOC wrote:
>
> That would imply that guard relays run at 100% capacity which i can't confirm
> for any of my guards.
I have run guards at 100% before, but it's not ideal.
Generally, Tor load-balances traffic to make sure that clients get consistently
good
That would imply that guard relays run at 100% capacity which i can't
confirm for any of my guards. Also seeing decline in usage would maybe
give a incentive for some relay operators to configure IPv6 in their
torrc, because there are thousands of relays which do have IPv6
connectivity, but
Hi,
> On 2 Aug 2019, at 09:20, NOC wrote:
>
> I see this staying longer with IPv4 longer than we should also problematic,
> we are at the point that there are providers out there who do have more
> clients than IPv4 space which results in having them making carrier grade
> NAT. Some of them
Hi,
I see this staying longer with IPv4 longer than we should also
problematic, we are at the point that there are providers out there who
do have more clients than IPv4 space which results in having them making
carrier grade NAT. Some of them have the problem that their NAT gear
gets maxed
Hi Neel,
> On 30 Jul 2019, at 03:11, Neel Chauhan wrote:
>
> Just a reminder that this proposal (Prop306) needs to be reviewed:
> https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/87
I can't find these changes that I requested to the proposal:
>> On 14 Jul 2019, at 02:47, teor wrote:
>>
>> I have
Just a reminder that this proposal (Prop306) needs to be reviewed:
https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/87
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On 2019-07-21 10:30, n...@neelc.org wrote:
Hi,
I have split up the sections. The GitHub PR is here:
Hi,
I have split up the sections. The GitHub PR is here:
https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/87
This was done as a fixup commit. If you want a new PR, please let me
know.
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On 2019-07-13 12:47, teor wrote:
Hi,
On July 11, 2019 12:37:03 AM UTC,
Hi,
On July 11, 2019 12:37:03 AM UTC, n...@neelc.org wrote:
>I'm really sorry about the delay in responding to your review. I was
>busy with an internship (unrelated to Tor, but still related to
>security) and was out a lot in my "free time".
>
>I have implemented your requested changes and the
Hi,
I'm really sorry about the delay in responding to your review. I was
busy with an internship (unrelated to Tor, but still related to
security) and was out a lot in my "free time".
I have implemented your requested changes and the GitHub PR is here:
Hi Iain,
Thanks for your review!
> On 2 Jul 2019, at 19:39, Iain Learmonth wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Hi,
>
> My comments are inline.
>
>> Filename: 306-ipv6-happy-eyeballs.txt Title: A Tor Implementation of
>> IPv6 Happy Eyeballs Author: Neel Chauhan Created: 25-Jun-2019
>> Supercedes:
Hi,
My comments are inline.
> Filename: 306-ipv6-happy-eyeballs.txt Title: A Tor Implementation of
> IPv6 Happy Eyeballs Author: Neel Chauhan Created: 25-Jun-2019
> Supercedes: 299 Status: Open Ticket:
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29801
>
> 1. Introduction
>
> As IPv4
Hi Neel,
> On 27 Jun 2019, at 11:10, n...@neelc.org wrote:
>
> Thank you so much for your feedback. I have pushed your changes (and revert
> my changes to 000-index.txt) as fixup commits to the GitHub PR.
>
> Could you please review the new changes?
I'm going to wait a week or two for other
Hi teor,
Thank you so much for your feedback. I have pushed your changes (and
revert my changes to 000-index.txt) as fixup commits to the GitHub PR.
Could you please review the new changes?
Thank You,
Neel Chauhan
On 2019-06-25 23:33, teor wrote:
Hi Neel,
Thanks for this proposal.
On 26
Hi Neel,
Thanks for this proposal.
> On 26 Jun 2019, at 11:15, n...@neelc.org wrote:
>
> I have a new proposal: A Tor Implementation of IPv6 Happy Eyeballs
>
> This is to implement Tor IPv6 Happy Eyeballs and acts as an alternative to
> Prop299 as requested here:
>
Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
I have a new proposal: A Tor Implementation of IPv6 Happy Eyeballs
This is to implement Tor IPv6 Happy Eyeballs and acts as an alternative
to Prop299 as requested here:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29801
The GitHub pull request is here:
19 matches
Mail list logo
