On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:56 AM teor wrote:
Thanks for the followup, Teor! I have only one comment on the changes:
> I made these useful features "may not" in:
> https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/103/commits/2662c688170696fbed2ba7e4dfa7f33ccf702435
We should avoid "may not" in
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your proposal review.
I've made most of the changes you've suggested, you can see the latest
version of the proposal here:
https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/103/files
I'll send another full text to the list when all the reviews are done.
I've also responded to your
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 1:31 AM teor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is an initial draft of Proposal 311: Relay IPv6 Reachability.
>
> This proposal includes:
> * relay IPv6 ORPort extends, and
> * relay IPv6 ORPort reachability checks.
>
> This is the first of 3 proposals:
> * Proposal 311: Relay
Hi,
Here is an initial draft of Proposal 311: Relay IPv6 Reachability.
This proposal includes:
* relay IPv6 ORPort extends, and
* relay IPv6 ORPort reachability checks.
This is the first of 3 proposals:
* Proposal 311: Relay IPv6 Reachability
* Proposal 312: Automatic Relay IPv6 Addresses
*
