On 6/2/20 3:01 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:48 PM Matt Traudt wrote:
>>
>
> Hi! I've got some comments on the FlashFlow proposal; I'll start with
> the ones that I think are most important, so that we can try to get
> them out of the way.
>
> First off, I'm
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:48 PM Matt Traudt wrote:
>
Hi! I've got some comments on the FlashFlow proposal; I'll start with
the ones that I think are most important, so that we can try to get
them out of the way.
First off, I'm concerned about the approach where measurers get to
consume a
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the quick response!
I've trimmed the conversation to the comments that need further
discussion.
> On 25 Apr 2020, at 06:46, Matt Traudt wrote:
>
> On 4/23/20 21:05, teor wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> - msm_duration [1 byte]
>>
>> What are the minimum and maximum valid values for
Thanks for the review, Teor. We really appreciate it.
Comments/responses inline with some trimming at the beginning (I gave up
and just left everything in after the first couple of responses).
On 4/23/20 21:05, teor wrote:
> ...
>
> But I'm particularly concerned about any communication between
