Re: [tor-dev] Proposing "Post-Quantum safe handshake implementation" as GSoc Project

On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:01:29 + isis agora lovecruft wrote: > > The bad news is that, work on it is on going, and it does not make a > > good GSOC project because, the bulk of the implementation work will > > likely happen before the summer. > > It will? Probably? If

Re: [tor-dev] Proposing "Post-Quantum safe handshake implementation" as GSoc Project

Yawning Angel transcribed 3.0K bytes: > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:07:40 +0530 > Jaskaran Singh wrote: > > I'm particularly interested to work on making TOR Handshakes > > Post-Quantum Safe. I feel that this should be implemented at the > > earliest because adversaries could store

Re: [tor-dev] Proposing "Post-Quantum safe handshake implementation" as GSoc Project

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:07:40 +0530 Jaskaran Singh wrote: > I'm particularly interested to work on making TOR Handshakes > Post-Quantum Safe. I feel that this should be implemented at the > earliest because adversaries could store the network traffic and > decrypt it later on

[tor-dev] Proposing "Post-Quantum safe handshake implementation" as GSoc Project

Hi, My name is Jaskaran, and I'm an Electronics Engineering undergrad in India. I'm a privacy, anonymity and FOSS supporter. I've worked in the past with the Libreoffice project during the Google Summer of Code 2016. This year I'm interested to work with the TOR project as a part of GSoC. I'm