> On Apr 6, 2021, at 6:37 AM, George Kadianakis wrote:
>
> David Goulet writes:
>
>> On 26 Mar (08:55:54), Holmes Wilson wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>>>
>>> We’re working on a peer-to-peer group chat app where peers connect over v3
>>> onion addresses.
>>>
>>> One issue
Interesting!
So it seems important to not have two clients hosting the same onion
address at the same time, which is doable, and then we have to figure out
this revision counter.
What happens if the revision counter is not incremented correctly?
Is it that the now offline host could become the
David Goulet writes:
> On 26 Mar (08:55:54), Holmes Wilson wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>
> Greetings,
>
>>
>> We’re working on a peer-to-peer group chat app where peers connect over v3
>> onion addresses.
>>
>> One issue are groups where there are many users but only a few are online in
>> a given
On 26 Mar (08:55:54), Holmes Wilson wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Greetings,
>
> We’re working on a peer-to-peer group chat app where peers connect over v3
> onion addresses.
>
> One issue are groups where there are many users but only a few are online in
> a given moment. Onion addresses are
Hi everyone,
We’re working on a peer-to-peer group chat app where peers connect over v3
onion addresses.
One issue are groups where there are many users but only a few are online in a
given moment. Onion addresses are forever, and existing peers might know every
peer in the network, but it
