> On 13 Mar 2019, at 08:44, Neel Chauhan wrote:
>
> Hi teor,
>
>> Thanks, I opened a ticket to review and merge it here:
>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29687
>> It should get reviewed within a week or two.
>
> First off, thank you for doing this! As of now, it seems to have
Hi teor,
Thanks, I opened a ticket to review and merge it here:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29687
It should get reviewed within a week or two.
First off, thank you for doing this! As of now, it seems to have been
merged.
I have added the "TrackFailures" flag to my
> On 7 Mar 2019, at 09:07, Neel Chauhan wrote:
>
> Hi teor,
>
> On 2019-03-05 21:12, teor wrote:
>> Sure. We usually do torspec changes using GitHub pull requests.
>> Can you open a pull request on https://github.com/torproject/torspec ?
>> Then link to the pull request from #27491 or in an
> On 5 Mar 2019, at 02:24, Neel Chauhan wrote:
>
> Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
>
> I have Proposal 299, also known as "Preferring IPv4 or IPv6 based on IP
> Version Failure Count" which makes ClientAutoIPv6ORPort take into account
> IPv4 and IPv6 failures.
>
> An older version of this
Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
I have Proposal 299, also known as "Preferring IPv4 or IPv6 based on IP
Version Failure Count" which makes ClientAutoIPv6ORPort take into
account IPv4 and IPv6 failures.
An older version of this document is available here:
