Re: [tor-dev] onionoo overload_general_timestamp (prop 328)

2022-02-10 Thread nusenu
Was there a particular motivation for this format change and granularity? And what do you think about changing it to use the -MM-DD hh:mm:ss format for consistency and having a direct human readable format here as well? related: Karsten used to maintain onionoo protocol

Re: [tor-dev] onionoo overload_general_timestamp (prop 328)

2021-11-09 Thread nusenu
Said this I will update both the timestamp and the protocol version for consistency. thanks, appreciated. nusenu -- https://nusenu.github.io ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-dev] onionoo overload_general_timestamp (prop 328)

2021-11-08 Thread Silvia/Hiro
Hi, On 6/11/21 15:19, nusenu wrote: Hi, in onionoo all timestamps used to be in the format -MM-DD hh:mm:ss Proposal 328 has timestamps in this same format https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/torspec/-/blob/main/proposals/328-relay-overload-report.md The newly added prop328 fields

[tor-dev] onionoo overload_general_timestamp (prop 328)

2021-11-06 Thread nusenu
Hi, in onionoo all timestamps used to be in the format -MM-DD hh:mm:ss Proposal 328 has timestamps in this same format https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/torspec/-/blob/main/proposals/328-relay-overload-report.md The newly added prop328 fields in oninoo appear to break with that