Is any IP6 in Iran? IP6 is blocked too?
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
On 5/9/13 1:34 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
Maybe OONI ppl can help with that?
I have an idea that I think might help. It isn't related to any current
pluggable transport. I think we could pump out a transport that would
not be easy to block.
It would be also be very interesting to be able to
Andrea Shepard:
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 10:40:52AM +, Nima wrote:
Iran is actively dropping connections to *any* unknown port right after
*60secs*.
Pluggable Transport successfully connects to Tor network, Although it
can not make a circuit in many ISPs including Mobin.
--
Nima
Maybe OONI ppl can help with that?
I have an idea that I think might help. It isn't related to any current
pluggable transport. I think we could pump out a transport that would
not be easy to block.
Contact me off list if you'd like to help me with it.
All the best,
Jacob
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 10:40:52AM +, Nima wrote:
Iran is actively dropping connections to *any* unknown port right after
*60secs*.
Pluggable Transport successfully connects to Tor network, Although it
can not make a circuit in many ISPs including Mobin.
--
Nima
0x1C92A77B
I
George Kadianakis:
Nima n...@redteam.io writes:
Iran is actively dropping connections to *any* unknown port right after
*60secs*.
Pluggable Transport successfully connects to Tor network, Although it
can not make a circuit in many ISPs including Mobin.
Ugh. This sucks.
What do you
On Sunday 05 May 2013 14:50:51 George Kadianakis wrote:
It would be interesting to learn which ports they currently whitelist,
except from the usual HTTP/HTTPS.
I also wonder if they just block based on TCP port, or whether they
also have DPI heuristics.
On the Tor side, it seems like we
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 04:18:56PM +0300, George Kadianakis wrote:
tor-admin tor-ad...@torland.me writes:
On Sunday 05 May 2013 14:50:51 George Kadianakis wrote:
It would be interesting to learn which ports they currently whitelist,
except from the usual HTTP/HTTPS.
I also wonder if
have there been any attempts to produce a pluggable transport which would
emulate http?
(Ah, I suppose there've been quite a bit of discussion indeed. (
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8676, etc.))
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Kostas Jakeliunas kos...@jakeliunas.comwrote:
If we had a PT that encapsulated obfs3 inside
the body of http then this may work.
I'm probably missing some previous discussions which might have covered it,
but: have there been any attempts to produce a pluggable transport which
would emulate http? Basically, have the transport use http
(Sorry, last email for now --) I see that StegoTorus is an Obfsproxy fork
that extends it to a) split Tor streams across multiple connections to
avoid packet size signatures, and b) embed the traffic flows in traces that
look like html, javascript, or pdf. However, its public repo seems to
haven't
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 10:44:01PM +0300, Kostas Jakeliunas wrote:
Also, 'Format-Transforming Encryption' looks
interesting, but I take it not much in terms of implementation beyond a
research paper [2] (which looks interesting).
[2]https://eprint.iacr.org/2012/494
I haven't tried it yet,
12 matches
Mail list logo
