Hi,
> On 4 Feb 2020, at 07:17, s7r wrote:
>
> teor wrote:
>> Hi s7r,
>>
>> Thanks for bringing up IPv6 address privacy extensions.
>>
>>> On 30 Jan 2020, at 02:19, s7r wrote:
>>>
>>
>> I read RFCs 4941 and 3041, looked at the tor directory spec, and did some
>> analysis:
>> * tor clients
Hi Nick,
Thanks so much for your review!
I've made most of the changes you've suggested, you can see the latest
version of the proposal here:
https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/105/files
I've also made changes in response to s7r's feedback about IPv6 privacy
extensions. Since sending
On 02/04/2020 03:13 PM, s7r wrote:
> These privacy extensions IPv6 addresses might be good for outbound bind
> exit addresses (for Exit relays), and maybe (not sure) for regular
> clients that could connect to their entry guards or bridges using a
> temporary IPv6 address.
Thanks. Those are
Mirimir wrote:
> On 02/03/2020 02:17 PM, s7r wrote:
>
>
>
>> In the current form of this proposal, it looks kind of optional ("We
>> propose this optional change, to improve..."). I propose removing the
>> line which contains "this optional change" and changing the following:
>>
>> In
On 02/03/2020 02:17 PM, s7r wrote:
> In the current form of this proposal, it looks kind of optional ("We
> propose this optional change, to improve..."). I propose removing the
> line which contains "this optional change" and changing the following:
>
> In practice, each operating system has
Hi teor,
teor wrote:
> Hi s7r,
>
> Thanks for bringing up IPv6 address privacy extensions.
>
>> On 30 Jan 2020, at 02:19, s7r wrote:
>>
>
> I read RFCs 4941 and 3041, looked at the tor directory spec, and did some
> analysis:
> * tor clients get new relay addresses within 4.5 hours
> * IPv6
Hi s7r,
Thanks for bringing up IPv6 address privacy extensions.
> On 30 Jan 2020, at 02:19, s7r wrote:
>
> There is another RFC (older), that is in use by Debian apparently:
> RFC3041. https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3041.txt
>
> From:
>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:04 AM teor wrote:
Hello again! This looks like another fine proposal. I'm leaving
comments inline, and clipping sections that I'm not commenting on.
>
> Filename: 312-relay-auto-ipv6-addr.txt
> Title: Tor Relays Automatically Find Their IPv6 Address
> Author: teor
>
Hi again,
Apologies, a quick follow-up:
There is another RFC (older), that is in use by Debian apparently:
RFC3041. https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3041.txt
From:
https://manpages.debian.org/buster/iproute2/ip-address.8.en.html
see `mngtmpaddr`
RFC4941 is newer and with some improvements,
Hi teor,
Thanks for this epic work, some lecture for me to deeply go over this
weekend.
By briefly reviewing I've noticed something important is missing that
should be a part of this proposal.
I am not sure under which section it should go under. I guess `3.2.2.
Use the Advertised ORPort IPv4
10 matches
Mail list logo
