Re: [tor-dev] Request for comments: patch to mark exit traffic for routing and statistical analysis

2016-10-24 Thread teor
> On 25 Oct. 2016, at 01:24, René Mayrhofer wrote: > > Am 20.10.2016 um 11:34 schrieb teor: >> We generally track tor features using the Tor bug tracker: >> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/newticket >> Use the Core Tor/Tor component. >> >> We have found that gitlab is

Re: [tor-dev] Request for comments: patch to mark exit traffic for routing and statistical analysis

2016-10-24 Thread René Mayrhofer
Am 20.10.2016 um 11:34 schrieb teor: > We generally track tor features using the Tor bug tracker: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/newticket > Use the Core Tor/Tor component. > > We have found that gitlab is useful for making comments on patches. > But I am also happy to use GitHub, or

Re: [tor-dev] Request for comments: patch to mark exit traffic for routing and statistical analysis

2016-10-20 Thread grarpamp
> On 2016-09-26 00:54, teor wrote: >> The one concern I have about this is that Tor-over-Tor would stick out more, >> as it would look like Tor coming out the OutboundBindAddressExit IP. >> But we don't encourage Tor-over-Tor anyway. ToT is technically not some special tor aware / tunneled relay

Re: [tor-dev] Request for comments: patch to mark exit traffic for routing and statistical analysis

2016-10-20 Thread teor
> On 20 Oct. 2016, at 20:19, René Mayrhofer wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > Michael Sonntag has extended the patch below to make it configurable and > tested it on a separate instance here in Linz. Seems to work for our use > case. If that seems a good option, then we'd like to

Re: [tor-dev] Request for comments: patch to mark exit traffic for routing and statistical analysis

2016-10-20 Thread René Mayrhofer
Hi everybody, Michael Sonntag has extended the patch below to make it configurable and tested it on a separate instance here in Linz. Seems to work for our use case. If that seems a good option, then we'd like to request review for upstream inclusion.

Re: [tor-dev] Request for comments: patch to mark exit traffic for routing and statistical analysis

2016-09-29 Thread teor
> On 26 Sep 2016, at 05:43, René Mayrhofer wrote: > > That is exactly what we have patched our local Tor node to do, although with a different (slightly hacky, so the patch will be an RFC type) approach by marking real exit traffic with a ToS flag to leave the

Re: [tor-dev] Request for comments: patch to mark exit traffic for routing and statistical analysis

2016-09-26 Thread René Mayrhofer
>>> That is exactly what we have patched our local Tor node to do, although >>> with a different (slightly hacky, so the patch will be an RFC type) >>> approach by marking real exit traffic with a ToS flag to leave the >>> decision of what to do with it to the next layer (in our setup Linux >>>

Re: [tor-dev] Request for comments: patch to mark exit traffic for routing and statistical analysis

2016-09-25 Thread teor
> On 23 Sep 2016, at 13:02, René Mayrhofer wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > Unfortunately, it took a bit longer than expected, but here goes... > FWIW, after the recent update (with subsequent downtime), our exit node > is fully up and running again (including this patch) and