Re: [tor-dev] GSOC 2019 tor project participation

2019-02-22 Thread Pili Guerra
Hi, We have applied for GSoC 2019 but will not find out if we have been accepted until the 26th February. So, watch this space :) Thanks, Pili — Project Manager: Tor Browser, UX and Community teams pili at torproject dot org gpg 3E7F A89E 2459 B6CC A62F 56B8 C6CB 772E F096 9C45 > On 22 Feb

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Don't include package fingerprints in consensus documents

2019-02-22 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:29 PM teor wrote: > > Hi, > > > On 22 Feb 2019, at 07:59, Iain Learmonth wrote: > > > > Signed PGP part > > Hi All, > > > > #28465 [0] needed a proposal. Feedback is welcome and encouraged. I've > > not written a proposal before, so if someone could let me know if I'm >

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Don't include package fingerprints in consensus documents

2019-02-22 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi all, On 22/02/2019 12:29, Nick Mathewson wrote: >> I had to read this paragraph twice to understand it. >> The way it's written, it sounds like we're doing a bad thing. >> (Until I read the "security" section at the end of the proposal.) >> >> Can you mention the positive aspects in the

[tor-dev] Anti-censorship discussion with Briar devs

2019-02-22 Thread Cecylia Bocovich
Hi, I just had a really great conversation with some of the developers at Briar about the recent work they've done in integrating some pluggable transports into their messaging application. I thought I would summarize some key points from the conversation here. In particular, this information