Kang td66bs...@gmail.com writes:
Here are my thoughts regarding why merging the Hidden Service
directory system and regular directory system is a bad idea.
Thanks for your thoughts.
I'm also unsure on whether ditching the hash ring system is a good
idea, but here are some comments on your
Justin Findlay:
Item h under
https://www.torproject.org/getinvolved/volunteer.html.en#OtherCoding
discusses (at least) the images at this page,
https://www.torproject.org/about/overview.html.en
which look as if they're copied from some EFF presentation. I've
recreated them as svg.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/11/13 14:10, Lunar wrote:
Justin Findlay:
Item h under
https://www.torproject.org/getinvolved/volunteer.html.en#OtherCoding
discusses (at least) the images at this page,
https://www.torproject.org/about/overview.html.en
which look as
On 11/11/2013 05:36 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
It seems Apple's terms are incompatible with copyleft, and that isn't
likely to change. Is there any copylefted code in TBB? I would
expect so, but I haven't enumerated it. People who choose copyleft
for their code do so for a reason,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:42:24PM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
Whilst we're on that topic, labelling the final link from the exit node
to the destination as unencrypted is unnecessarily scary as well Perhaps
we could reword it to encrypted if destination service is encrypted
and the other links to
Looks fine!
BTW, does it work for you? Did you try the server-side using the
ServerTransportOptions torrc option (tor = 0.2.5.1-alpha)?
I have only tested it using the external mode.
I've gotten obfsproxy + bananaphone to run with tor in managed mode;
using the ServerTransportOptions... But
I thought this might be of interest to the Tor community.
--Wendy
- Forwarded message from Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr -
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:10:27 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr
To: Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
Cc: perpass
AFAIK, this should also be possible with the current state of HS
descriptor publishing.
It should be possible, yes, but it's not a serious problem due to the
decentralised nature of hidden service descriptor publishing.
On the other hand I'm under the impression that there's only a few
Please do it in your bananaphone branch if that's more convenient to
you.
(If you want to be more adventurous, you can even make a new branch on
top of the current upstream master with your setup() function and the
obfs2 changes. I will merge that faster than the bananaphone changes.)
OK I
