On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Thomas White thomaswh...@riseup.net wrote:
Mike Hearn,
Simple. If you start filtering anything at all, regardless of what it
is ... then I will
block any connection of your relays to mine
...
Freedom isn't free unless it is
totally free and a selective
One of my first concerns would be that this would build in a very easy
way for a government (probably the US government) to compel Tor to add
in a line of code that says If it's this hidden service key, block
access.
And people who run Tor could easily take it out again, what with it being
This isn't about 'acceptable usage of Tor', this is necessary compromise
to limit exit operators' exposure to ISP harrassment.
Even if we accept your premise that no exit operator cares about internet
abuse, it's still the same thing. ISP's define what is acceptable usage of
their internet
On 07/21/2014 12:34 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
Tor provides exit policies to let exit relay operators restrict traffic
they consider to be unwanted or abusive. In this way a kind of
international group consensus emerges about what is and is not
acceptable usage of Tor. For instance, SMTP out is
As I recall, you are also the person who raised the idea of coin
tinting or a similar concept in the bitcoin community to identify
suspect coins and that backfired spectacularly on you.
Yes, that is the person. Though the term is known as 'taint'. One of
many discussions from that
Hi All,
I've found a few typos in the first few sections of 224-rend-spec-ng.txt at
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/proposals/224-rend-spec-ng.txt
I tried finding an existing bug or wiki entry on trac to log these against, but
I couldn't find anything relevant with:
Tim:
I've found a few typos in the first few sections of 224-rend-spec-ng.txt at
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/proposals/224-rend-spec-ng.txt
Feel free to provide your fixes in the form of a patch.
`git format-patch` can help crafting an email.
--
Lunar
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 11:48 +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
One of my first concerns would be that this would build in a
very easy
way for a government (probably the US government) to compel
Tor to add
in a line of code that says If it's this hidden service
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Tim t_e...@icloud.com wrote:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/search?q=proposal+264
The search string is wrong, adjust to find this...
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12424
___
tor-dev mailing
