Re: [tor-dev] Weather post-GSoC

2014-08-30 Thread meejah
Lukas Erlacher t...@lerlacher.de writes: 1. remove local copy of OnionPy and replace with real thing That means we need to get OnionPy packaged and into wheezy-backports, no? Medium-term, yes. We can use it as a (git) submodule of tor-weather meantime (e.g. until we're reasonably sure

Re: [tor-dev] Weather post-GSoC

2014-08-30 Thread Lukas Erlacher
Cool, I thought of that, too. Sounds like a workable thing to do. I will keep the master branch of OnionPy clean and working (modulo bugs) so you should be fine just using that. I'll set up a way to run the tor-weather tests before I push a new version of OnionPy. Would you like me to fork

[tor-dev] DNSSEC

2014-08-30 Thread merc1984
Does anyone know why TOR does not use DNSSEC? The only documentation I found on the TORProject website for DNS does not actually explain how DNS works on TOR. I infer it must be TCP, as TOR can not do UDP, and I imagine that relay nodes must be the resolvers in order to resolve .onion domains.

Re: [tor-dev] DNSSEC

2014-08-30 Thread Lunar
merc1...@f-m.fm: Does anyone know why TOR does not use DNSSEC? The only documentation I found on the TORProject website for DNS does not actually explain how DNS works on TOR. I infer it must be TCP, as TOR can not do UDP, and I imagine that relay nodes must be the resolvers in order to