teor wrote:
Are there no-cost, non-license-restricted compilers available for Windows
that support C99?
Yes, the MinGW compilers fit the bill.
Erik
--
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
On 18 Oct 2014, at 06:29, teor teor2...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there no-cost, non-license-restricted compilers available for Windows
that support C99?
This could be a way out for those who don't wish to pay for the VS 2013
upgrade.
But it's a bit more of a barrier than using an existing
teor:
Nick Mathewson:
* Some people want to use paid versions of Visual Studio, and have
paid for a version earlier than VS2013, and don't want to pay for a
newer one. I sympathize with this: I've been on paid upgrade
treadmills myself, and it's always tempting to save money by skipping
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 03:29:51PM +1100, teor wrote:
|
| On 18 Oct 2014, at 13:29 , tor-dev-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
| Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:29:02 -0400
| From: Nick Mathewson ni...@freehaven.net
| To: tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
| Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 03:29:51PM +1100, teor wrote:
* Some compilers for weird old hardware have never been upgraded to
even rudimentary C99 support, and trying to build code with those
weird old compilers is a good way to expose some bugs. I sympathize
with this too: there was one
