Re: [tor-dev] A quick and dirty UX evaluation of Tor Messenger

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Sukhbir Singh wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > Hi all, > > > > First of all, great work on Tor Messenger - it's awesome to see Tor > pushing > > to be more accessible to non-technical folks. > > > > I decided to take some notes when installing + using for

Re: [tor-dev] Tor dev meeting times this week and beyond!

> On 3 Nov 2015, at 13:01, Nick Mathewson wrote: > > Secondary meeting time and patch workshop: > Monday at 0100 UTC (8:00pm EST, 5:00pm PST) Hi Nick, I'm not sure which time zones "Monday" refers to. Is the Secondary meeting time and patch workshop: Tuesday at 0100

Re: [tor-dev] Update of prop#250: Random Number Generation During Tor Voting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 asn, Is it possible to add a field called 'NOTARY' in the COMMIT and REVEAL values where we include the SR pubkey + certificates and everything we need so that we can validate each COMMIT / REVEAL value and tie it to the identity of a directory

Re: [tor-dev] Update of prop#250: Random Number Generation During Tor Voting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, Epic work. I agree that the code enforcing commit majority was not making a difference in the partition attack. I also agree that the partition attack is (almost) useless, expensive and very noisy. An attacker can get the same result if,

Re: [tor-dev] running a BWauth

Thanks to all for the feedback. That Torflow works from links slower than those of the fastest relays seems to indicate it's measuring relative path resistance as much or more than absolute bandwidth. I often see it produce sensible results and hope that some tuning and fixing might produce

Re: [tor-dev] An ANTLR 4 grammar for Tor bridge network statuses

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello developers, > > in the past few days I have been working on a grammar to parse Tor > bridge network statuses and hopefully other Tor descriptors in the >

[tor-dev] 1-1-1 task exchange meeting on Thursday, Nov 5, 15:00 UTC in #tor-dev

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello devs, we'll have another 1-1-1 task exchange meeting on Thursday, November 5, 2015, 15:00 UTC in #tor-dev https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20151105T15 Quick reminder: The idea of the 1-1-1 task exchange meeting is

[tor-dev] An ANTLR 4 grammar for Tor bridge network statuses

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello developers, in the past few days I have been working on a grammar to parse Tor bridge network statuses and hopefully other Tor descriptors in the future. It's working, for some definition of working, but some issues remain and I need some

Re: [tor-dev] running a BWauth

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 09:32:26PM -0800, Jesse V wrote: > Yep, I've run Mike Perry's code before. It's all in torflow. I was also on a > 1 gbits link, but as I recall it wasn't that saturated so you might be able > to get away with a 500 mbits. I've been running it on a 100mbit link, and it