Re: [tor-dev] Set up Tor private network

> On 26 Feb 2016, at 06:25, Tom Ritter wrote: > > On 25 February 2016 at 21:00, SMTP Test wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I try to set up a Tor private network. I found two tutorials online >>

Re: [tor-dev] Set up Tor private network

On 25 February 2016 at 21:00, SMTP Test wrote: > Hi all, > > I try to set up a Tor private network. I found two tutorials online > (http://liufengyun.chaos-lab.com/prog/2015/01/09/private-tor-network.html > and https://ritter.vg/blog-run_your_own_tor_network.html) but

[tor-dev] Set up Tor private network

Hi all, I try to set up a Tor private network. I found two tutorials online ( http://liufengyun.chaos-lab.com/prog/2015/01/09/private-tor-network.html and https://ritter.vg/blog-run_your_own_tor_network.html) but seems that they both are outdated. Could anyone please give me a tutorial or some

Re: [tor-dev] stopping the censoring of tor users.

About the issue of exit nodes needing to know to which bridge they need to connect to, could we not make a system that similair to hidden services, so that the nodes can connect to them without knowing the actulle ip adress? If we could design an automatic system in which flash proxies could be

Re: [tor-dev] stopping the censoring of tor users.

You may be interested in the following from the FAQ: https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#HideExits You should hide the list of Tor relays, so people can't block the exits. There are a few reasons we don't: a) We can't help but make the information available, since Tor clients need to

[tor-dev] Fwd: Re: Support for mix integration research

I'm forwarding this to the list, because it might contain relevant information. Mostly within George's reply. Initial reason to not send my reply to the list was to not bother too many people with seemingly irrelevant questions on my part. I agree with the reply given in the forwarded message.

[tor-dev] stopping the censoring of tor users.

hello there! i don't know if this mailing list works but i thought of giving it a try. i was lately reading an article ( http://www.pcworld.com/article/3037180/security/tor-users-increasingly-treated-like-second-class-web-citizens.html ) and it was about tor users getting blocked from accessing

Re: [tor-dev] Tor Consensus Transparency, take two

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Linus Nordberg wrote: > Hi, > Hi, Linus! This is now proposal 267. ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Re: [tor-dev] Support for mix integration research

Katharina Kohls writes: > Hi everyone, > > we are a team of 4 PHD students in the field of IT security, working at > the Ruhr-University Bochum at the chair for systems security and the > information security group. > > Currently we work on a research project with the

Re: [tor-dev] Next version of the algorithm

Reinaldo de Souza Jr writes: > On 2/16/16 12:20, George Kadianakis wrote: >> The >> very latest prop259 basically forgets the unreachable guard status as soon as >> the algorithm terminates. I wonder if we actually want this. Hopefully >> guardsim >> has a simulation