George Kadianakis:
> this is an experimental mail meant to address legitimate usability concerns
> with the size of onion addresses after proposal 224 gets implemented. It's
> meant for discussion and it's far from a full blown proposal.
Taking a step back here, I believe the size of the address
whoops, didn't reply-all.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 9:32 AM, George Kadianakis
> wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Please let me know in what way this scheme is completely broken!
>
> I think it has the same
ban...@openmailbox.org writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> On 2016-07-29 17:26, George Kadianakis wrote:
>> Hello people,
>>
>> this is an experimental mail meant to address legitimate usability
>> concerns
>> with the size of onion addresses after proposal 224 gets implemented.
>> It's
>> meant for
Nick Mathewson writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:26 AM, George Kadianakis
> wrote:
>> So basically in this scheme, HSDirs won't be able to verify the signatures of
>> received descriptors.
>>
>> The obvious question here is, is this