Re: [tor-dev] Remaining 4 bits in prop224 addresses

On 06 Dec (17:47:01), Jesse V wrote: > On 12/06/2016 11:27 AM, David Goulet wrote: > > We had little discussion but some of us agree for sure on having bits for > > the > > version number. That will tell a tor client to fetch the right descriptor > > instead of trying all version that have the

Re: [tor-dev] Remaining 4 bits in prop224 addresses

> On 7 Dec. 2016, at 09:47, Jesse V wrote: > > On 12/06/2016 11:27 AM, David Goulet wrote: >> We had little discussion but some of us agree for sure on having bits for the >> version number. That will tell a tor client to fetch the right descriptor >> instead of

Re: [tor-dev] Remaining 4 bits in prop224 addresses

On 12/06/2016 11:27 AM, David Goulet wrote: > We had little discussion but some of us agree for sure on having bits for the > version number. That will tell a tor client to fetch the right descriptor > instead of trying all version that have the same type of public key (.onion > address). We

Re: [tor-dev] sketch: An alternative prop224 authentication mechanism based on curve25519

Thanks Lunar for bringing this into discussion. See below. David Goulet wrote: > On 06 Dec (17:23:10), Lunar wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Sorry to be late to the party. I still haven't seen UX concerns fully >> addressed, and I think we should not create a specification that will >> make the life of our

Re: [tor-dev] sketch: An alternative prop224 authentication mechanism based on curve25519

On 06 Dec (17:23:10), Lunar wrote: > Hi! > > Sorry to be late to the party. I still haven't seen UX concerns fully > addressed, and I think we should not create a specification that will > make the life of our users harder if we can avoid it. I believe it can be addressed by a good UI in TBB

Re: [tor-dev] Remaining 4 bits in prop224 addresses

On 06 Dec (07:05:47), Jesse V wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been closely following the other Proposal 224 threads regarding the > next-generation of onion services. I'm glad to see that we have a > timeline and plan for migrating the network. One unresolved point is > what to do with the remaining

Re: [tor-dev] Remaining 4 bits in prop224 addresses

Jesse V writes: > Hello all, > > I've been closely following the other Proposal 224 threads regarding the > next-generation of onion services. I'm glad to see that we have a > timeline and plan for migrating the network. One unresolved point is > what to do with the

Re: [tor-dev] sketch: An alternative prop224 authentication mechanism based on curve25519

Hi! Sorry to be late to the party. I still haven't seen UX concerns fully addressed, and I think we should not create a specification that will make the life of our users harder if we can avoid it. s7r: > George Kadianakis wrote: > > I have a more mature torspec branch now for your eyes and

[tor-dev] Remaining 4 bits in prop224 addresses

Hello all, I've been closely following the other Proposal 224 threads regarding the next-generation of onion services. I'm glad to see that we have a timeline and plan for migrating the network. One unresolved point is what to do with the remaining 4 bits in the longer addresses. Section 1.2 in