[tor-dev] GSoC 2017 - Questions

Hey, I'm Krishna Shukla, I'm studying a bachelors of computer science at the University of Queensland. I guess the relevant subjects I've studied so far covers C and Unix programming, Computer Networks, Algorithms and Data Structures, and Programming in the large. (got a high distinction in

[tor-dev] GSOC 2017: Revised Proposal for anon-connection-wizard

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello everyone! I have revised my previous proposal with the help of anonym's feedback. Could anyone offer me some feedback about it please? Any recommendation, suggestion and criticism are very welcome and appreciate d! #What project would

Re: [tor-dev] GSOC 2017: Proposal for anon-connection-wizard (anonym)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 anonym: > I might be misunderstanding what you and Patrick mean with > "impossible" (or rather, which use cases are impossible) w.r.t. > using Tor Launcher outside of the Tor Browser; Tails uses the Tor > Launcher shipped in Tor Browser, but

Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable Transports 2.0, draft 1 Specification

Thank you for the feedback on the specification draft, Yawning. We will take all of this feedback into account in the next draft. Some specific points are addressed below. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Yawning Angel wrote: > NB: I'm personally not doing any

Re: [tor-dev] Proposition: Applying an AONT to Prop224 addresses?

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 01:59:42AM -0400, Ian Goldberg wrote: > > To add an aside from a discussion with Teor: the entire "version" field > > could be reduced to a single - probably "zero" - bit, in a manner perhaps > > similar to the distinctions between Class-A, Class-B, Class-C... addresses > >

[tor-dev] "firefox --app" for meek-http-helper

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 02:28:00PM +, anonym wrote: > Tails uses the Tor Launcher shipped in Tor Browser, but it's run as a > stand-alone XUL application (`firefox --app ...`), so the *web* > browser isn't started as part of it. Sorry to change the subject, but should we be running

Re: [tor-dev] Proposition: Applying an AONT to Prop224 addresses?

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:27:33AM +0200, Alec Muffett wrote: > > > > We could leave the version field outside the AONT, though, but commit to > > changing the paramaters of the AONT (in particular, the domain > > separation constant?) if we change the version number, so that an > > adversary