> On 19 Jun 2017, at 08:14, iry wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Hello everyone!
>
> I met some troubles when testing the new torrc.d-style configuration
> directories feature
> (https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1922). Could anyone
> share some ideas on the problem,
> On 19 Jun 2017, at 00:56, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
>
> @TPO devs
>
> Since you do a great job safely collecting useful stats on the network, would
> you be open to adding a self-identifying anonOS distro option to the
> protocol? Would this be OK or is it mission creep? On the flip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello everyone!
I met some troubles when testing the new torrc.d-style configuration
directories feature
(https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1922). Could anyone
share some ideas on the problem, please? I will be really appreciated.
The
@TPO devs
Since you do a great job safely collecting useful stats on the network,
would you be open to adding a self-identifying anonOS distro option to
the protocol? Would this be OK or is it mission creep? On the flip side
it would be much more accurate than anything we can do to estimate