> On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:04, iry wrote:
>
>>> Therefore, may I propose to let Tor parse only the files whose
>>> name ends with .torrc ?
>>
>> Yes, this is standard behaviour among many tools.
To be more precise, most tools accept files ending in ".conf".
We might want tor to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
>> Therefore, may I propose to let Tor parse only the files whose
>> name ends with .torrc ?
>
> Yes, this is standard behaviour among many tools.
>
>> Or maybe even only parse number_filename.torrc for better
>> consistency and for more clear
> On 4 Feb 2018, at 09:37, iry wrote:
>
> In best case users will just be frustrated because Tor does not work
> as expected and in worst case this could be dangerous. This could be a
> severe problem especially because of the following reasons:
> 1. filename.torrc~
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear Tor Developers,
I have been testing and using the torrc.d feature for a while, and
here is a potential improvement we may make.
Currently, when using a torrc.d directory, for example:
> %include /etc/torrc.d/
Every file in the directory will
> My first suggestion would be
> [...]
> My second suggestion would be to get a Tor binary and run it yourself,
> not as part of a package. If it works there, then you know that your
> next steps are to figure out why your package isn't working for you
Hi Yawning and Roger!
Thank you so much
nusenu:
> If someone with commit privileges has time to review and merge
> before the weekend that would be great.
teor marked the ticket as merge_ready on 2018-01-31, does anyone with
commit privileges have time to merge it?
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/25107
thanks,
Karsten Loesing:
> On 2018-02-03 12:53, nusenu wrote:
>>
>>
>> Karsten Loesing:
>>> On 2018-02-03 01:32, nusenu wrote:
thanks for looking into it
>>>
>>> Looks like the CollecTor host is down, along with several other hosts. I
>>> sent mail to the admins.
>>
>> Does that imply that we are
On 2018-02-03 12:53, nusenu wrote:
>
>
> Karsten Loesing:
>> On 2018-02-03 01:32, nusenu wrote:
>>> thanks for looking into it
>>
>> Looks like the CollecTor host is down, along with several other hosts. I
>> sent mail to the admins.
>
> Does that imply that we are actually loosing raw
Karsten Loesing:
> On 2018-02-03 01:32, nusenu wrote:
>> thanks for looking into it
>
> Looks like the CollecTor host is down, along with several other hosts. I
> sent mail to the admins.
Does that imply that we are actually loosing raw CollecTor data until it comes
back?
--
Hi,
On 02/02/18 12:08, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> Also, the Metrics team has(?) to come up with a proposal on this IIRC.
> Until then it would not be considered a valid project?
Considered a valid project by whom?
Metrics is currently very busy and may not have time to assist with the
project, but
On 2018-02-03 01:32, nusenu wrote:
> thanks for looking into it
Looks like the CollecTor host is down, along with several other hosts. I
sent mail to the admins.
All the best,
Karsten
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
11 matches
Mail list logo