Hi Neel,
Thanks for your initial draft code, and this proposal.
On February 6, 2019 12:26:40 AM UTC, Neel Chauhan wrote:
>Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
>
>First off, thank you to Nick for making this an official proposal and
>thank you again for marking it as open. I really appreciate this. Also,
Damian Johnson:
> Thanks teor! Quite side note: it would be helpful if such questions
> are broached earlier in the process. Google has been calling for org
> applications for several weeks now. Asking roughly a day before the
> deadline creates last minute confusion and reduces the chances of an
Hi tor-dev@ mailing list,
First off, thank you to Nick for making this an official proposal and thank you
again for marking it as open. I really appreciate this. Also, thank you teor
for aiding me on my first proposal.
My proposal is available on torspec here:
Thanks teor! Quite side note: it would be helpful if such questions
are broached earlier in the process. Google has been calling for org
applications for several weeks now. Asking roughly a day before the
deadline creates last minute confusion and reduces the chances of an
affirmative response.
Hi Nick,
Thanks for posting this initial draft. I enjoyed reading more of the details,
after hearing about it last week.
On February 5, 2019 5:02:50 PM UTC, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>Filename: 300-walking-onions.txt
>Title: Walking Onions: Scaling and Saving Bandwidth
>Author: Nick Mathewson
Argh, I'm really sorry, I thought I'd reached the end of the proposal
but my questions were addressed further down. Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Michael
On 05/02/2019 17:42, Michael Rogers wrote:
> I'm very happy to see this proposal! Two quick questions about relay
> selection:
>
> * Can a
I'm very happy to see this proposal! Two quick questions about relay
selection:
* Can a client specify that it wants an exit node whose policy allows
something unusual, e.g. exiting to a port that's not allowed by the
default policy? If not, does the client need to keep picking exit nodes
until
Filename: 300-walking-onions.txt
Title: Walking Onions: Scaling and Saving Bandwidth
Author: Nick Mathewson
Created: 5-Feb-2019
Status: Draft
0. Status
This proposal describes a mechanism called "Walking Onions" for
scaling the Tor network and reducing the amount of client bandwidth
Dear Whonix Community,
On February 5, 2019 2:20:18 PM UTC, iry wrote:
>
>
>teor:
>> Dear Whonix Community,
>>
>> On February 4, 2019 11:52:44 PM UTC, iry wrote:
>> Dear Tor Developers,
>>
>> Whonix is applying to be a Google Summer of Code organization this
>> year. I am writing on behalf
Hi All,
On 04/02/2019 06:35, teor wrote:
> If we add enough noise to protect most users, then we will have privacy by
> design.
I would argue that noise does not help here, as we would have to add
enough noise to protect against a guard discovery attack, which is too
much noise for the stats to
Hello all,
I just tagged obfs4proxy-0.0.9. The main features of this release are
primarily related to improving the behavior of the `meek_lite` transport.
Since some of the changes are major, I will expand on them separately
from the brief summary given in the ChangeLog.
* A forked version[0]
11 matches
Mail list logo
