Hi all,
This is an email about an alternative proposal:
Let's deploy sbws to some more bandwidth authorities.
>> Do we have funding to continue to improve the bandwidth measurement
>> infrastructure? Or to maintain it?
>>
>> If we don't have any grants in the pipeline, now would be a good time
Hi,
Here are some detailed diagnostics.
My overall conclusion is: there isn't much bandwidth left on that exit.
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 01:30:18PM +1000, teor wrote:
>> Which bandwidth authorities are limiting the consensus weight of these
>> relays? Where are they located?
>
> The one in
Hi,
> On 2 Jun 2019, at 18:21, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 01:30:18PM +1000, teor wrote:
>> Which bandwidth authorities are limiting the consensus weight of these
>> relays? Where are they located?
>
> The one in question is in Sweden:
>
Hi,
On 5 May 2019, at 07:02, Steve Snyder wrote:
> On 5/4/19 12:26 PM, David Fifield wrote:
>> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 03:27:53PM +, Yawning Angel wrote:
>>> On 5/3/19 1:48 PM, Steve Snyder wrote:
FYI, obfs4proxy no longer recognizes address:port in this form:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 01:30:18PM +1000, teor wrote:
> Which bandwidth authorities are limiting the consensus weight of these
> relays? Where are they located?
The one in question is in Sweden:
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/D5F2C65F4131A1468D5B67A8838A9B7ED8C049E2
It has votes
