George Kadianakis:
> Hello all,
>
> after lots of investigation on anonymous credentials, we are glad to
> present you with a draft of the onion services anti-DoS proposal using
> tokens.
Thanks! I finally managed to read through and think about the proposal
(but note: I've not read proposal 327
Nice work, George! In case folks are interested, I wrote up a very similar
proposal independently:
https://chris-wood.github.io/draft-wood-cfrg-blind-signatures/draft-wood-cfrg-rsa-blind-signatures.html
Perhaps we should converge? :-)
Best,
Chris
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 3:36 PM, George
On 2/11/21 7:42 PM, Nicholas Hopper wrote:
>
> Hi George!
Sp, fellow Chaum fan! I liked bnymble! It was the least scary of all
of the revocation schemes I've read. At least I could understand the
linkability properties.
Were you at the party when Chaum's patents expired? I forget. I suppose
Hi George!
A couple of thoughts about this proposal:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:36 PM George Kadianakis
wrote:> ## 4.1. Token issuer setup>
> The Issuer creates a set of ephemeral RSA-1024 "issuance keys" that will be
> used during the issuance protocol. Issuers will be rotating these
On 2/11/21 5:36 PM, George Kadianakis wrote:
> We are particularly looking forward to feedback about:
> - Token issuance services
> - The anonymous credential scheme chosen
> - The XXXs and design decisions of the proposal
>
> Hope you have a pleasant read!
> # 9. Acknowledgements
>
> Thanks
Hello all,
after lots of investigation on anonymous credentials, we are glad to
present you with a draft of the onion services anti-DoS proposal using
tokens.
While the basic idea of the proposal should remain reasonably solid,
there are various XXX sprinkled around the proposal and some of them
