teor wrote:
Are there no-cost, non-license-restricted compilers available for Windows
that support C99?
Yes, the MinGW compilers fit the bill.
Erik
--
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
On 18 Oct 2014, at 06:29, teor teor2...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there no-cost, non-license-restricted compilers available for Windows
that support C99?
This could be a way out for those who don't wish to pay for the VS 2013
upgrade.
But it's a bit more of a barrier than using an existing
teor:
Nick Mathewson:
* Some people want to use paid versions of Visual Studio, and have
paid for a version earlier than VS2013, and don't want to pay for a
newer one. I sympathize with this: I've been on paid upgrade
treadmills myself, and it's always tempting to save money by skipping
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 03:29:51PM +1100, teor wrote:
|
| On 18 Oct 2014, at 13:29 , tor-dev-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
| Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:29:02 -0400
| From: Nick Mathewson ni...@freehaven.net
| To: tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
| Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 03:29:51PM +1100, teor wrote:
* Some compilers for weird old hardware have never been upgraded to
even rudimentary C99 support, and trying to build code with those
weird old compilers is a good way to expose some bugs. I sympathize
with this too: there was one
Looking at this blog post [1] even the support for C99 in VS2013 is
limited. I don't know if tor hit the limitations, that's for you to
decide.
C99 is 15 years old ... It should be sane to use it.
[1]
On 17 Oct 2014, at 18:07, M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote:
Looking at this blog post [1] even the support for C99 in VS2013 is
limited. I don't know if tor hit the limitations, that's for you to
decide.
C99 is 15 years old ... It should be sane to use it.
Please also see bug
teor wrote:
I just looked over this patch and it looks safe and simple to commit
(haven't have a chance to compile it yet though).
The correct order of declaration, asserts, and initialisation /
assignment has been preserved in the code.
If we commit this patch, we should probably change
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo
mle+to...@mega-nerd.com wrote:
teor wrote:
I just looked over this patch and it looks safe and simple to commit
(haven't have a chance to compile it yet though).
The correct order of declaration, asserts, and initialisation /
assignment
Nick Mathewson wrote:
Keep in mind that C99 is 15 years old now.
snip
Personally, I think I'm still inclined to say that the day for a more
modern style has arrived.
I'm totally with you on this. I've been coding C to meet the C99 standards
since the mid-2000s :-).
Erik
--
On 18 Oct 2014, at 13:29 , tor-dev-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:29:02 -0400
From: Nick Mathewson ni...@freehaven.net
To: tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using Visual Studio
* Some people want to use paid versions of Visual
Hi all! I'm new at this list :-)
I decided to understand how TOR works and I want to build it in VS to debug
it and explore it's internals. I have Visual Studio on my first PC and I
got errors during build on address.c. I investigated the reason: commit
0ca83872468af59b94e14fe7fdfcb38cb5a3f496
I
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Владимир Мартьянов
vilgefo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all! I'm new at this list :-)
I decided to understand how TOR works and I want to build it in VS to debug
it and explore it's internals. I have Visual Studio on my first PC and I got
errors during build on
As far as I know only Visual Studio 2013 has C99 support. Upgrade to VS2013
costs about 300$ for commercial versions, a lot of code was written in
earlier versions...
By the way, I fixed only about 10 lines of code and finally I managed to
build the TOR using VS2008, so i think it's not so hard to
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:16:32PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Владимир Мартьянов
vilgefo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all! I'm new at this list :-)
I decided to understand how TOR works and I want to build it in VS to debug
it and explore it's internals. I
15 matches
Mail list logo
