Re: [tor-dev] GSoC'16 proposal: the Torprinter project (a Panopticlick-like website)

2016-03-22 Thread Lunar
Pierre Laperdrix: > Thanks for the valuable feedback! > It would be great to have the features that you cite into the website. > For the first version, my point of view is to mainly focus on the added > value for developers which is to add/remove tests easily and get the > relevant data as easily

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC'16 proposal: the Torprinter project (a Panopticlick-like website)

2016-03-22 Thread Pierre Laperdrix
Hi Lunar, Thanks for the valuable feedback! It would be great to have the features that you cite into the website. For the first version, my point of view is to mainly focus on the added value for developers which is to add/remove tests easily and get the relevant data as easily as possible for

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC'16 proposal: the Torprinter project (a Panopticlick-like website)

2016-03-19 Thread gunes acar
Hi Pierre, Thanks for the very well thought proposal! I'm curious about your ideas on the "returning device problem." EFF's Panopticlick and AmIUnique.org use a combination of cookies and IP address to recognize returning users - so that their fingerprints are not "double-counted." Since these

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC'16 proposal: the Torprinter project (a Panopticlick-like website)

2016-03-19 Thread Damian Johnson
> Hi Pierre, on first glance looks like a nice proposal. Just a heads up > though that to be considered there needs to be a prospective mentor > for this project. Reaching out to tor-dev@ is a great first step and > hopefully it'll do the trick, but if it doesn't try asking on the > #tor-dev irc