It's already established that, for clients, onion-pi's are
discouraged---onion-pi wifi doesn't protect enough (I.e., at all) from
browser-based attacks.
Given that, The question is now, Are onion-pi's are good enough to be
useful relays? Roger said no. Is there a more informed opinion on this
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 10:11:24PM +0200, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 06/27/2014 09:44 PM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
What is the current state of the art on this, and if it is ready for
larger deployment want to buy about 50-100 of them.
In my eyes, an access point that has a captive portal that
Roger wrote:
And the onionpi boxes don't have enough cpu to be a useful relay.
I'm not sure what the definition of 'useful relay' is, but I am running
an exit relay with 900KB/s and between 1000-1500 consensus weight. This
is the limit for the pi, but definitively above the 100KB/s I read
Martin Kepplinger:
Am 2014-06-29 08:57, schrieb Roger Dingledine:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 10:11:24PM +0200, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 06/27/2014 09:44 PM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
What is the current state of the art on this, and if it is ready for
larger deployment want to buy about 50-100 of
Roger et al, I'm interested in something like onion-pi to be a Tor relay.
Is there something with enough COU to be viable? I know nothing about
this embedded scene.
-V
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
On 06/27/2014 09:44 PM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
What is the current state of the art on this, and if it is ready for
larger deployment want to buy about 50-100 of them.
In my eyes, an access point that has a captive portal that teaches
people about Tor and facilitates the download of Tor Browser
What is the current state of the art on this, and if it is ready for
larger deployment want to buy about 50-100 of them.
-V
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
