Re: [tor-dev] onion v2 deprecation plan?

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:22 PM, nusenu wrote: > even though you are probably years away from deprecating onion v2 services > it is certainly good to have a clear plan. > > I'm asking because the sooner onion v2 are deprecated the sooner some > people can stop worrying

[tor-dev] onion v2 deprecation plan?

Hi, even though you are probably years away from deprecating onion v2 services it is certainly good to have a clear plan. I'm asking because the sooner onion v2 are deprecated the sooner some people can stop worrying about malicious HSDirs. thanks, nusenu -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu

Re: [tor-dev] [TSoP] stem.client - introductions

Dave Rolek writes: > Hi everyone! Hi Dave, Congratulations on your project/acceptance! > In particular, I'll be working on expanding stem's support to act as a > Tor client, aka stem.client, speaking with Tor's ORPort. You can see > more about stem in general [1], and read

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal #291 Properties (was IRC meeting)

Mike Perry: > Mike Perry: > > Heyo. > > > > We're going to have a meeting to discuss Proposal 291. See this thread: > > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2018-April/013053.html > > 3. Describe adversary models for our variant proposals from the notes. >(Why do we disagree? In

Re: [tor-dev] onion v2 deprecation plan?

Hi nusenu, thanks for bringing this up! Filed tickets for a couple things we should sort out before deprecating v2... https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/25918 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/25920 ___ tor-dev mailing list

[tor-dev] Standardizing the 'onion service' name

Hi all, teor suggested engaging the list with #25918 so here we go! Ticket #25918 has a couple goals... 1. Provide a tracking ticket for the rename effort. 2. Come to a consensus on if we should move forward with "onion service" or revert back to "hidden service". The limbo we've been in for