On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 12:38 PM Michael Rogers wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> It's great to see that some children of #25500 have already been
> released in the 0.3.4 series. Can I ask about the longer-term plan for
> this work, and whether #23289 (or something similar) is part of it?
>
> The context for
Hi All,
The notes for the PrivCount and Prio meeting are at:
http://meetbot.debian.net/tor-meeting/2018/tor-meeting.2018-11-20-22.05.html
T
--
teor
--
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 7:36 AM teor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have deployed sbws on one bandwidth authority (longclaw).
>
> Here's a request for additional feedback, and a progress update:
>
>
> Request for Feedback: Relay Bandwidth Self-Tests
>
> Torflow and sbws use relays' self-reported observed
Hello,
I won’t be able to be at this meeting, but I would like to make some comments:
1. Prio’s zero-knowledge proofs (i.e. SNIPs) are not secure against a single
malicious server. If you are using them the decide whether or not to include a
given input, then a malicious server can cause good
