[tor-relays] Bandwidth Spike

2013-07-18 Thread Bryan Carey
I'm a fairly new Tor relay operator and noticed something peculiar with my bandwidth for the relay recently. It seems to have jumped WAY up and just plateaued at what I have the peak bandwidth limit set at. Is there any kind of explanation for this? Is this normal behavior? Could it indicate some k

Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly

2013-07-18 Thread grarpamp
I don't see anything specific regarding Tor or its capabilities in their AUP. But there are bits that could be extended to cover Tor. Which it appears they did, whether for bandwidth or cost of dealing with 'complaints'. They are in New Hampshire, perhaps you could let the FreeStateProject know (c

Re: [tor-relays] Tortilla

2013-07-18 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 13:09:08 -0800 I wrote: > What is Tortilla? A poorly named tool with zero ties to Tor. How is this question related to tor relays? -- Andrew http://tpo.is/contact pgp 0x6B4D6475 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torpro

Re: [tor-relays] Tortilla

2013-07-18 Thread I
No further questions. FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more! ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] Tortilla

2013-07-18 Thread krishna e bera
On 13-07-18 06:37 PM, beatthebasta...@inbox.com wrote: > If asking Tor people a question related to Tor things garners a > smart-arse response like that how will I know which is not? > > > > -Original Message- > *From:* danielcas...@gmail.com > *Sent:* Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:52

Re: [tor-relays] Tortilla

2013-07-18 Thread I
If asking Tor people a question related to Tor things garners a smart-arse response like that how will I know which is not? -Original Message-From: danielcas...@gmail.comSent: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:52:01 +0100To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.orgSubject: Re: [tor-relays] Tortillahttp://lmgt

Re: [tor-relays] Tortilla

2013-07-18 Thread Daniel Case
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=What+is+Tortilla+Tor%3F ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Tortilla

2013-07-18 Thread I
What is Tortilla? FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more! ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-

Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly

2013-07-18 Thread Tom Ritter
On 18 July 2013 14:10, Roman Mamedov wrote: > Maybe they just realized they can't actually offer unmetered bandwidth as they > advertise, and Tor is about the only application that can readily eat all > bandwidth you'll give it, no matter what. > > Tom, out of curiosity how much did you manage to

Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly

2013-07-18 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:02:29 -0400 krishna e bera wrote: > On 13-07-18 11:51 AM, mick wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:49:46 -0400 > > Tom Ritter allegedly wrote: > > > >> Sending this out, as I suspect I am not the only person running a node > >> on SiteValley, as they have pretty good bandwi

Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly

2013-07-18 Thread Marina Brown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/18/2013 12:02 PM, krishna e bera wrote: > On 13-07-18 11:51 AM, mick wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:49:46 -0400 Tom Ritter >> allegedly wrote: >> >>> Sending this out, as I suspect I am not the only person running >>> a node on SiteValley, as

Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly

2013-07-18 Thread Marina Brown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/18/2013 12:44 PM, mick wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:02:29 -0400 krishna e bera > allegedly wrote: > >> On 13-07-18 11:51 AM, mick wrote: >>> >>> I wonder if we are going to see more of this sort of thing now. >>> I think the tor network nee

Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly

2013-07-18 Thread mick
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:02:29 -0400 krishna e bera allegedly wrote: > On 13-07-18 11:51 AM, mick wrote: > > > > I wonder if we are going to see more of this sort of thing now. I > > think the tor network needs greater geographic diversity. > > Makes me wonder if there is some kind of legal pres

Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly

2013-07-18 Thread André Nunes Batista
I'm currently trying to build a network on Brazil. The main problem is to get a fast network link. Telecoms brought out shitty infrastructure and high "combo deal prices". But I hope that bringing up more nodes should attenuate the issue. At least for web browsing. -- Luther Blisset GNUPG/PGP KE

Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly

2013-07-18 Thread krishna e bera
On 13-07-18 11:51 AM, mick wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:49:46 -0400 > Tom Ritter allegedly wrote: > >> Sending this out, as I suspect I am not the only person running a node >> on SiteValley, as they have pretty good bandwidth for pretty cheap. >> >> I had inquired in the beginning if they all

Re: [tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly

2013-07-18 Thread mick
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:49:46 -0400 Tom Ritter allegedly wrote: > Sending this out, as I suspect I am not the only person running a node > on SiteValley, as they have pretty good bandwidth for pretty cheap. > > I had inquired in the beginning if they allowed Tor, and they said > yes, but if we ge

[tor-relays] Sitevalley is no longer Tor-friendly

2013-07-18 Thread Tom Ritter
Sending this out, as I suspect I am not the only person running a node on SiteValley, as they have pretty good bandwidth for pretty cheap. I had inquired in the beginning if they allowed Tor, and they said yes, but if we get too many abuse complaints we'll shut it down. So maybe 4 or 5 abuse comp