On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 20:15:51 +0100
elrippo elri...@elrippoisland.net allegedly wrote:
Jope. I tend to have some issues with some CA's.
But yes you are right, i should get me a decent certificate.
I will do that, promise.
You self signed your site certificate...?
I don't see any
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:12:37 +
From: Thomas Hand th6...@gmail.com
To: tor-relays tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] exit and skype
Message-ID:
CAKqc3T7u6mWC6CZLMoaEGkr2iUPe3rabgV-=fi=3LzP67w=o...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:50:18 +
mick m...@rlogin.net wrote:
I don't see any problem per se with a self-signed certificate on a site
which does not purport to protect anything sensitive (such as financial
transactions). The problem with this particular certificate is that
the common name
On Nov 5, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Jan Hendrik den Besten t...@janhendrik.eu wrote:
Boy, now I am in trouble...
I run an exit node from my home address for a few weeks now, but my gf
starts complaining she cannot use Skype anymore to chat with her mum.
I understand Microsoft blocks all tor exits
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:30:13 +0600
Roman Mamedov r...@romanrm.net allegedly wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:50:18 +
mick m...@rlogin.net wrote:
I don't see any problem per se with a self-signed certificate on a
site which does not purport to protect anything sensitive (such as
financial
Hi List :)
Paul Syverson:
You may want to take a look at
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/life-without-ca
What about the Perspectives addon?
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~perspectives/
(or http://perspectives-project.org/ where it redirects me)
and the talk BlackHat USA 2011: SSL And The Future Of
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 07:59:45PM +0100, Oliver Schönefeld wrote:
my ISP is offering 50 Mbps downstream 10 Mbps up, so i thought i'd
share 20 Mbps max and 15 Mbps avg (respectively 2560 KBps max and 1920
KBps avg) in a inner tor-relay.
so i put the latter vaues in the bandwith-limits tab of
On 2013-11-09 19:59:45 (+0100), Oliver Schönefeld wrote:
my ISP is offering 50 Mbps downstream 10 Mbps up, so i thought i'd share 20
Mbps max and 15 Mbps avg (respectively 2560 KBps max and 1920 KBps avg) in a
inner tor-relay.
If I'm not mistaken, you should stick to 10 Mbps. You're a
If you have 50 down and 10 up, then the 10 is your number. The lower of the
two.
As a relay, all data you receive, you send out again. So you have 1280 KB of
potential relay capacity.
Your ISP probably has a FUP you may violate if you constantly use up all your
bandwidth.
You could set
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 06:19:16PM +0100, elri...@elrippoisland.net wrote 5.8K
bytes in 0 lines about:
: I did some graphs of the attacks raiding against the network and the method
is
: quite interesting.
Perhaps I missed something, what are the attacks? These graphs show some
sort of numbers
On 11/9/2013 10:15 AM, Jon Gardner wrote:
On Nov 5, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Jan Hendrik den Besten t...@janhendrik.eu wrote:
Boy, now I am in trouble...
I run an exit node from my home address for a few weeks now, but my gf
starts complaining she cannot use Skype anymore to chat with her mum.
I
Dave,
Unless I am mistaken, your non-exit relay never connects to a web page.
Only exit relays do that, so it can't be your IP that is blocked but
whatever exit relay you may be connecting through.
On 11/9/2013 11:15 PM, David Carlson wrote:
On 11/9/2013 10:15 AM, Jon Gardner wrote:
On
12 matches
Mail list logo
