Thanks for the reply Andy.
I'll try changing the sources.list first.
If that doesn't work I found the armel sources, so I can just compile them.
Richard
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Andy Isaacson a...@hexapodia.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:09:50PM -0500, Richard Budd wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:20:22 -0500
From: that guy g...@gmx.us
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay in Russia/China
Message-ID: 528746e6.1030...@gmx.us
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 11/15/2013 06:20 PM,
It sounds like a challenge to get a relay up in China...
Perhaps this talk might inpsire a way of helping Tor into China.
http://www.ted.com/talks/michael_anti_behind_the_great_firewall_of_china.html
Robert
GET FREE SMILEYS FOR YOUR
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:52 PM, I beatthebasta...@inbox.com wrote:
Isn't the free deal for one instance only?
Yes, it's for one instance per account (and one account counts as an
email address plus a credit card).
--
Runa A. Sandvik
___
tor-relays
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Eric van der Vlist v...@dyomedea.com wrote:
Without bandwidth limitation that's true. OTH, I currently consume only
~ 50 Gbits/month and the limit is 500 Gbits. Would a relay limited to
let's say 200 or 300 Gbits/month still be useful for the community?
People,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:14:15AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
People, can we please mind using the proper units.
I know Tor doesn't make it easy because Tor itself incorrectly
uses Bytes. But Tor is a network application, and real network
apps are measured in 'bits per second'
I understand your
