On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:33:05 +0100
phrag ph...@phra.gs allegedly wrote:
FYI: Just got this to my Tor relay mail address, with a zip file
attached extracting to a '.scr' win exe. Curiously routed via
a .gov.uk mail relay...
GB03022014.scr: PE32 executable (GUI) Intel 80386, for MS Windows
Why shouldn't I be concerned when, by simply accessing this page, all my
actual ip/dns information is readily available to all?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I am trying to run a middle relay with no-exit policy. It was my
assumption that a middle relay would only communicate with other relays
on 9001 port. Yet I see my relay IP address attempting connections to
other IP address on ports that are non-9001 (or 9030).
That depends on what the other relay operators have configured their hosts
to talk to. It's a common thing to set relays on other ports to obscure
the kind of traffic, and to work around certain firewall rules.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Tora Tora Tora t...@allthatnet.com wrote:
I am
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014, at 05:18 PM, K. Besig wrote:
Why shouldn't I be concerned when, by simply accessing this page, all my
actual ip/dns information is readily available to all?
Because that's how Tor works. Every relay has to be able to connect to
every other relay (apart from Bridges) so the
Why shouldn't I be concerned when, by simply accessing this page, all my
actual ip/dns information is readily available to all?
Better question is 'why should you be?'. :P
To work relays publish their address so others can contact them. If
you consider your address to be secret then your best
Thanks for the responses, both are the logical conclusion to being able to
publicly view a relay's ip/dns information..
I guess my concern was based on [unfounded?] paranoia over possible isp
reprisals?
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Damian Johnson ata...@torproject.orgwrote:
Why shouldn't
Is it correct to assume that if I am running a locked-down IP address
behind the firewall, it means my relay would connect to a very limited
number of other relays that also run standard ports? Would that would
affect anonymity?
Also, what is the right to deal with this issue without compromising
On 02/04/2014 07:20 PM, Tora Tora Tora wrote:
Is it correct to assume that if I am running a locked-down IP address
behind the firewall, it means my relay would connect to a very limited
number of other relays that also run standard ports? Would that would
affect anonymity?
A relay *must* be
OK, I got it. So open outgoing connections, but restrict incoming
connections to my ports, e.g, 9001 and 9030, correct?
On 02/04/2014 02:00 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 02/04/2014 07:20 PM, Tora Tora Tora wrote:
Is it correct to assume that if I am running a locked-down IP address
behind the
Hello List!
Since 7/2013 I operate a small Tor Server as internal relay or as obfuscated
bridge.
What is more necessary: An internal relay to speed up the network, or an
obfuscated bridge to help censored users?
My ISP gives me dynamic IPs, which change daily. I guess this is good for
bridges,
Hi,
I really wonder why we even bother to have a FAQ:
http://torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#RelayOrBridge
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours
Sebastian Urbach
--
Those who would give up essential Liberty,
to purchase a little temporary
It might be better at the top of the page.
Hi,
I really wonder why we even bother to have a FAQ:
http://torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#RelayOrBridge
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Hi Relay Operators,
We have made some modifications to the way we
are running our live scoreboard script. Previously we were running into
some problems with handling multiple simultaneous web requests, as the
server started a heavy script for each incoming request. Now
Some sites such as RiseUp and DuckDuckGo could be accessed via onion
addresses. I would like to know which address (onion address vs clearnet
address) should I use when using TBB. I believe both ways are more or
less the same in terms of identity protection and communication security
(provided
15 matches
Mail list logo
