On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 01:03:43PM -0700, Lance Hathaway wrote:
On the plus side, obfs3 is still pretty strong, and it's one of the
common pluggable transports right now. Scramblesuit is not live in the
official bundles yet (AFAIK), but it just released and has some pretty
robust-looking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:51:58 +
Trigger Happy triggerha...@openmail.cc wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi list,
I'm running tor-relay (middle) on VPS from statnet.pl (reseller form
Hetzner)
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 09:39:05PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
I would like to be an exit for port 8333 only. I have configured my relay
to do this, but I am not being listed with the relay flag and do not see
any traffic exiting my node (at least not using arm). I saw an FAQ that
says this is
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 05:02:07PM -0400, Tora Tora Tora wrote:
Declining dramatically
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/90743CFA1B93295B9334CC0C625D22990AABA25F
vs
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/CC2F7C6ED12B67CB3882B98213E02DEF2CB82293
that is holding steady
A fine
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 08:46:44PM +, eugene zhukovsky wrote:
I am trying to setup Tor relaying, but it doesn't work so far.
Windows 8, private vpn.
I opened ports 80,443,9001 and 9030 (both TCP and UDP) on my Comcast router
to be forwarded to the box I'm trying to configure.
I added
Am 22.03.2014 um 21:04 schrieb tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org:
Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
or, via
Roger,
I beg your pardon. I would not want fud to deter new relays. I think the
risks are overplayed as it is.
It was only that it was published on this list. I published the relay nickname
somewhere and regret it.
I suggested the port change because that is what the VPS operators have told
Thanks Roger, that does indeed clear things up.
For background, I maintain the bitcoinj project which is a widely used Java
Bitcoin implementation. We are planning on bundling the Orchid Tor client
and switching on Tor by default for Bitcoin wallets that are based on this
library, if we can.
Thank you very much Roger for the advice.
I can't seem to make it work, so I'll just try setting it up on a different
box
---
Best wishes,
Eugene Zhukovsky
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:12 AM, I beatthebasta...@inbox.com wrote:
Roger,
I beg your pardon. I would not want fud to deter
Good to know. I guess I will not shutdown underused relay just yet. A
prepaid traffic allotment would be a terrible thing to waste! :-)
...
A fine research question. A lot of the questions from
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay
apply here too.
One theory is that it's
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 03:12:47 -0800
I beatthebasta...@inbox.com allegedly wrote:
I suggested the port change because that is what the VPS operators
have told me was the first thing to do to avoid being constantly
'hacked' which has happened over and over to me.
Actually I agree that moving
11 matches
Mail list logo
