*Dear list members,*
*I was thinking about implementing a node on a Mikrotik Router which is
located in one of my companies datacenters with an 1Gig Uplink. *
*Do you already have some experience in deploying TOR on this kind of
routers?I found an interesting tutorial on how to get TOR runni
Is the nightly repository currently the Debian repository to use for
2.5.3-alpha packages?
I ask because I am looking to move off of nightlies and onto more stable
packages once they are available. Am running scramblesuit so need 2.5.x.
Thanks,
Delton
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 27/03/14 19:51, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Karsten Loesing
>> wrote:
>>> Before going through your list of things we'd want to track below, let's
>>> first talk about our options to turn a list of finger
Dear list members,
The scoreboard and the involved systems are in need for some
adjustments. Anupam is working on it and we expect that the issues are
resolved on this weekend.
Sorry for the interruption.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours
Sebastian Urbach
--
Hi Renke,
Thanks, we are looking into it asap.
On March 28, 2014 2:13:42 PM re...@mobtm.com wrote:
Sebastian,
> http://datarepo.cs.illinois.edu/relay_scoreboard.html
I believe your updater script for the scoreboard is broken - the values are
unchanged since 2014-03-17 :)
Renke
__
Sebastian,
> http://datarepo.cs.illinois.edu/relay_scoreboard.html
I believe your updater script for the scoreboard is broken - the values are
unchanged since 2014-03-17 :)
Renke
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://list
Tora Tora Tora:
> OK, perhaps I have missed "the how" and "which" somewhere, but which
> signature am I supposed to verify the new Tor 0.2.5.3 tarball against? I
> tried the ones mentioned on Tor signing page and none seem to stick. A
> typical message is:
>
>
> # gpg --verify tor-0.2.5.3-alpha.t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 06:48:21AM +0100, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> Hi Ramo,
>
> Thanks for running an exit!
Thanks. I've been running one for ages, but the appreciation is always nice.
> You will run into similar trouble again and
> again, unfortunatel
