On Thursday, November 27, 2014 8:39pm, "Libertas" said:
[snip]
> If anyone knows of a good way of finding high-bandwidth budget
> dedicated servers (a search term or a list of providers, for example),
> please share. I expected there to be more of a market for this kind of
> thing than I've found.
They don't seem to be offering a lot of servers right now...
https://clients.rokabear.com/cart.php?gid=3
niklas
On 28/11/2014 02:56, ja...@icetor.is wrote:
Someone may wish to look into Rokubear, I remember them being mentioned
as Tor Exit friendly a few years back.
-Jason
On 11/28/2014 01:54
On 28/11/2014 02:54, Syrup-tan wrote:
Turns out the colocation costs $672/year for the network, and another
$780/year for power, so I don’t think Voxility is very feasible for an
exit node without bargaining with them.
This isn't all that expensive for colo; it's just not on the bargain end
e
sorry was https://www.rokabear.com/ not roku
-Jason
On 11/28/2014 01:56 AM, ja...@icetor.is wrote:
> Someone may wish to look into Rokubear, I remember them being mentioned
> as Tor Exit friendly a few years back.
> -Jason
>
> On 11/28/2014 01:54 AM, Syrup-tan wrote:
>> Turns out the colocation c
Someone may wish to look into Rokubear, I remember them being mentioned
as Tor Exit friendly a few years back.
-Jason
On 11/28/2014 01:54 AM, Syrup-tan wrote:
> Turns out the colocation costs $672/year for the network, and another
> $780/year for power, so I don’t think Voxility is very feasible f
Turns out the colocation costs $672/year for the network, and another $780/year
for power, so I don’t think Voxility is very feasible for an exit node without
bargaining with them.
> If anyone knows of a good way of finding high-bandwidth budget
> dedicated servers (a search term or a list of pr
Stop
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 27, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Libertas wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>> On 11/27/2014 07:50 PM, t...@zengers.de wrote:
>> And I agree about SSHGuard. I've had a better experience with it,
>> and it generally seems like a more carefully
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/27/2014 07:50 PM, t...@zengers.de wrote:
> And I agree about SSHGuard. I've had a better experience with it,
> and it generally seems like a more carefully developed and more
> thoroughly documented project. Strangely, though, most experienced
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/25/2014 02:29 PM, Syrup-tan wrote:
>
> The colocation isn’t cheap to say the least, and it only gives
> 5TB/month unless we want to pay more per month;
>
This may the largest logistical problem I've encountered when looking
for dedicated ser
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:58:57AM -0500, Libertas wrote:
> And I agree about SSHGuard. I've had a better experience with it, and
> it generally seems like a more carefully developed and more thoroughly
> documented project. Strangely, though, most experienced sysadmins
> still use and suggest
10 matches
Mail list logo
