There was a new line added to authority director configs, which was a response
to the recent Sybil attack [1]:
MinUptimeHidServDirectoryV2 96 hours
That's only 4 days, I wonder if anything else has changed.
--SiNA
[1]
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-consensus-health/2014-December/0
In case there are people that don't subscribe to both.
Forwarded Message
Subject: [tor-talk] please advise on renting a gigabit capable dedicated
server
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 19:31:05 -0600
From: Christopher Yeager
Reply-To: tor-t...@lists.torproject.org
To: tor-t...@lists.torp
On January 3, 2015 2:03:33 AM bigbud...@safe-mail.net wrote:
Hi,
Thanks Sebastian, That explains the loss of guard status back in August at
least. I totally missed that announcement.
Back to the main issue, it does look like one or two others at least are
having this problem. Is it simply as
Thanks Sebastian, That explains the loss of guard status back in August at
least. I totally missed that announcement.
Back to the main issue, it does look like one or two others at least are having
this problem. Is it simply as a result of being in a Lizard-blacklisted
netblock? Bigbud is in 8
Hi,
Found the snippet with the changes for the guards:
Tor Weekly News, 30th of July 2014
Once directory authorities have upgraded, they will “assign the Guard flag
to the fastest 25% of the network”. Some experiments showed that “for the
current network, this results in about 1100 guards, do
Not sure if related, but I noticed today one of my exit relays was not
operating properly. Turned out the bind server was not resolving properly. I
turned off dnssec and it started working again...
On January 2, 2015 6:45:30 PM EST, tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org
wrote:
>Send tor-relay
On January 3, 2015 12:29:48 AM bigbud...@safe-mail.net wrote:
Hi,
On a related note the relay lost guard status too a few months ago and I
couldn't see why that would be.
The criterias for the guards changed a few months ago but i can't find the
text right now. You can see a nose dive regard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This was reported yesterday 01.01.2015 in IRC too, for this relay:
3D7E274A87D9A89AF064C13D1EE4CA1F184F2600
The same it was pushing good amounts of traffic and the consensus
weight dropped to 20 with no modifications made to the Tor config file
or an
On the 29th December one of our relays, bigbud
(6911888F83565892FE23F1B03EB501D80E1E8780) which had a consensus of 630+ and
had been running for nearly 18 months (100 days uptime running 2.5.8) suddenly
started receiving much less traffic.
I have seen a gradual reduction in traffic over the co
02.01.2015, 19:47 Kura:
> I think something must have happened, I restarted half a dozen or so
> of my relays over a week ago and none of them have been given the
> HSDir flag, which if I remember rightly is a 21 hour flag? I may be
> mistaken but, I would have expected that flag to be back with ov
I think something must have happened, I restarted half a dozen or so of my
relays over a week ago and none of them have been given the HSDir flag, which
if I remember rightly is a 21 hour flag? I may be mistaken but, I would have
expected that flag to be back with over a week of uptime.
--
Kur
No clue. I wonder if there's some backlash from a anti-attack mechanism of
some sort? There was a few attempted attacks against the Tor network, but
it wasn't anything worth discussing. Check out the post on the 31st from
blog.torproject.org.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Sebastian Urbach
wrot
Hi,
https://metrics.torproject.org shows a big nose dive recently regarding the
number of HSDir's. Did i miss anything relevant in the last days ? That
seem to be the reason why i see increasing download numbers on my system.
Thanks for any lind of info.
--
Sincerely yours / Sincères salutati
Yeah I have read both of those and I wasn't expecting it to be instant, I have
many relays that are ~6 months in age so I know about the ramp up. Thanks
thought. =)
--
Kura
t: @kuramanga [https://twitter.com/kuramanga]
w: https://kura.io/ [https://kura.io/]
g: @kura [http://git.io/kura]
On 02/
I am currently peaking 46.39 MBps / 371.12Mbps,
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/F14B7BF44F9B170DFF628F237E0C7E8D631F957E,
with "NumCPUs 2" on an AMD A8-5600K with 8GB RAM. My setup is based on
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Tor#.2B100Mbps_Exit_Relay_configuration_example
.
I presume yo
In case you haven't already seen it, you should only run two Tor
processes per IP address:
https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server#multiple_tor_processes
Best regards,
Alexander
---
PGP Key: https://dietrich.cx/pgp | 0x727A756DC55A356B
On 2015-01-02 17:06, Kura wrote:
> Thanks fo
Thanks for the replies, I'll run multiple instances from one box then. =)
--
Kura
t: @kuramanga [https://twitter.com/kuramanga]
w: https://kura.io/ [https://kura.io/]
g: @kura [http://git.io/kura]
On 02/01/2015 16:05:44, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
Hi Kura,
On January 2, 2015 4:58:42 PM "Kura" wro
Hi Kura,
On January 2, 2015 4:58:42 PM "Kura" wrote:
Hey guys, I recently decided to get myself an 8 core, 16 GB RAM machine to
use for running an exit relay and was wondering, Tor only works on one
core, even setting NumCPUs to 2 doesn't do a whole lot so, how is it even
possible to get mor
Actually, on 2nd thought, you may not have to limit your bandwidth because
Tor MAY handle this for you.
Also, it's recommended to run your (presumably, 8) servers on different
network addresses as well. If you are running a colocation rack this won't
be difficult, but if you are doing this from yo
Yep, you got it. Multiple processes with different configurations. You
should also limit their bandwidths proportionally so you don't saturate
your network interface.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Kura wrote:
> Hey guys, I recently decided to get myself an 8 core, 16 GB RAM machine to
> use fo
Hey guys, I recently decided to get myself an 8 core, 16 GB RAM machine to use
for running an exit relay and was wondering, Tor only works on one core, even
setting NumCPUs to 2 doesn't do a whole lot so, how is it even possible to get
more than maybe, 300Mbps or so from one relay? Maybe I'm mis
Since people aren't going to like paying the 10g switchport
fee, nor the price of small bandwidth over 1gbps on it,
the fastest real world box for individual tor nodes is probably
going to be that i7-5820k off a gig port for $1235 or less.
___
tor-relays
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Justaguy wrote:
> https://globe.thecthulhu.com/#/relay/F528DED21EACD2E4E9301EC0AABD370EDCAD2C47
>
> Someone just got 149.08 MB/s on a non-exit relay.
> This is amazing!
> Would you mind saying what kind of hardware you use for this?
> Ipredator used https://ipredat
23 matches
Mail list logo
