Re: [tor-relays] New month, new TOR exit servers, need ELI5 pls

2016-05-22 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 22 May 2016, at 11:30, Random Tor Node Operator > wrote: > > On 05/22/2016 04:00 PM, Markus Koch wrote: >> Yes, but how many ports do I have to open to be "useful"? In an >> extreme case: Would it help just to forward port 80 and 433? > > I think the most

Re: [tor-relays] New month, new TOR exit servers, need ELI5 pls

2016-05-22 Thread Markus Koch
Port 6667 ... long time no see thank you for the information! markus 2016-05-22 16:10 GMT+02:00 Felix Eckhofer : > Hey. > > Am 22.05.2016 16:00, schrieb Markus Koch: >> >> Yes, but how many ports do I have to open to be "useful"? In an >> extreme case: Would it help just to

Re: [tor-relays] New month, new TOR exit servers, need ELI5 pls

2016-05-22 Thread Felix Eckhofer
Hey. Am 22.05.2016 16:00, schrieb Markus Koch: Yes, but how many ports do I have to open to be "useful"? In an extreme case: Would it help just to forward port 80 and 433? It would still be useful and receive the "Exit" flag: "Exit" -- A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to

Re: [tor-relays] New month, new TOR exit servers, need ELI5 pls

2016-05-22 Thread Markus Koch
2016-05-22 16:30 GMT+02:00 Random Tor Node Operator : > On 05/22/2016 04:00 PM, Markus Koch wrote: >> Yes, but how many ports do I have to open to be "useful"? In an >> extreme case: Would it help just to forward port 80 and 433? > > I think the most spartanic Exit Policy

Re: [tor-relays] New month, new TOR exit servers, need ELI5 pls

2016-05-22 Thread Tristan
You can close port 22 by adding it to your exit policy. The syntax would be something like ExitPolicy reject *:22 You should put this towards the top of the exit policy rules so it isn't overridden by other rules. On May 22, 2016 8:34 AM, "Markus Koch" wrote: As I