Re: [tor-relays] suspicious "Relay127001" relays

2016-07-05 Thread Green Dream
> It's up to directory authority operators to deal with > suspicious/rogue/misconfigured relays by marking them as > invalid/rejected/badexit. So... what's going on in this particular case and what are the directory authorities going to do, if anything? As a relay operator near the top of the CW

Re: [tor-relays] suspicious "Relay127001" relays

2016-07-05 Thread nusenu
> In good news, 91 new high speed exits means Tor network should be > truly blazing for a while :) these are non-exits relays (currently) currently 93 relays (89 running): https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/0478362226f1b74744bec8700c4a3732/raw/e8a5ed82061a2b6a83f982964794ef79c067f005/Relay

Re: [tor-relays] suspicious "Relay127001" relays

2016-07-05 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 05:10:49PM +0200, Niklas K. wrote: > It's up to directory authority operators to deal with > suspicious/rogue/misconfigured relays by marking them as > invalid/rejected/badexit. > > Relay operators are not supposed to decide what other relays they may be put > in a circu

Re: [tor-relays] suspicious "Relay127001" relays

2016-07-05 Thread Niklas K.
It's up to directory authority operators to deal with suspicious/rogue/misconfigured relays by marking them as invalid/rejected/badexit. Relay operators are not supposed to decide what other relays they may be put in a circuit with (apart from notifying the network which nodes belong to the sam

Re: [tor-relays] suspicious "Relay127001" relays

2016-07-05 Thread simon
On 05.07.2016 13:31, Xza wrote: > 91 at the moment and they will soon gain more flags. > https://sourceforge.net/p/nepenthes/wiki/Home/ > Seems like some sort of honeypot. > Most seem to be from AWS & Linode & Leaseweb USA. How does the process work to exclude nodes from the network? If I underst

Re: [tor-relays] suspicious "Relay127001" relays

2016-07-05 Thread Xza
91 at the moment and they will soon gain more flags. https://sourceforge.net/p/nepenthes/wiki/Home/ Seems like some sort of honeypot. Most seem to be from AWS & Linode & Leaseweb USA. On July 3, 2016 10:59:00 AM GMT+02:00, nusenu wrote: >some new ones: >http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onio

Re: [tor-relays] which DirPort should be advertised ?

2016-07-05 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 5 Jul 2016, at 19:23, Toralf Förster wrote: > > Signed PGP part > On 07/05/2016 04:01 AM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > > In 0.2.8.3-aplha, "clients, onion services, and bridge relays always use an > > encrypted begindir connection for directory requests". > > Encrypted beginner connect

Re: [tor-relays] which DirPort should be advertised ?

2016-07-05 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/05/2016 04:01 AM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > In 0.2.8.3-aplha, "clients, onion services, and bridge relays always use an > encrypted begindir connection for directory requests". > Encrypted beginner connections are made over the ORPort.