Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:47:56AM -0400, Chad MILLER wrote: > I made a tor-middle-relay package, so the TVs, Wifi Routers, > Toasters, Self-driving Cars, Phones... of the world that are running > that new kind of Ubuntu (or other OS that implements this package > system!) can also help the Tor

Re: [tor-relays] BSD buildbot: call for enrollment

On 8/24/16, George wrote: >> src/or/connection.c:1796: warning: passing argument 1 of 'TO_OR_CONN' >> discards qualifiers from pointer target type > I can't remember which Tor branch, but I do remember Tor at a certain > release wouldn't run on FreeBSD 8.4. The above warning

Re: [tor-relays] BSD buildbot: call for enrollment

On 08/24/16 16:34, grarpamp wrote: > On 8/24/16, George wrote: >> There is a BSD-focused buildbot at https://buildbot.pixelminers.net/ for > > Cool. I had only 1 warning on an old freebsd 8 box: > > src/or/connection.c:1796: warning: passing argument 1 of 'TO_OR_CONN' >

Re: [tor-relays] Tor not running since last Debian update

Hey, The process is not running ? Or is it running behind without behind connected to Tor network ? What is there the log ? /var/log/tor/log(for example) > Hi > > So I think 2 days ago I updated tor on my debian stable machine and > since then it's seen as not running anymore. It should be a

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> Ubuntu/Debian doesn't have the latest version of Tor. You should use the > official repository: https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html.en I already use this repo for all my relays :) <3, -- Aeris Individual crypto-terrorist group self-radicalized on the digital Internet

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> Currently not on Xenial and Jessie (even in backport). >< Don’t match 2.8.6 too : snap ba16ce2958119a238d7931e709f30e932938218f ubuntu yakkety tor_0.2.8.6-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb 5839f7b8bdc74cc26c829452d458d5c797ff3666 official tor tor_0.2.8.6-3_amd64.deb

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

Ubuntu/Debian doesn't have the latest version of Tor. You should use the official repository: https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html.en On Aug 24, 2016 12:50 PM, "Aeris" wrote: > > Aeris, I should be worried if any of those matched. Did you know 0.2.8 is > > out? > >

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> Aeris, I should be worried if any of those matched. Did you know 0.2.8 is > out? Currently not on Xenial and Jessie (even in backport). >< <3, -- Aeris Individual crypto-terrorist group self-radicalized on the digital Internet https://imirhil.fr/ Protect your privacy, encrypt your

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

* Aeris [2016-08-24 19:25:31 +0200]: much less an untrusted tor package For information, the tor binary inside the snap doesn’t match any official upstream I can find… SHA1 Snap ba16ce2958119a238d7931e709f30e932938218f Xenial (tor_0.2.7.6-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb)

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> much less an untrusted tor package For information, the tor binary inside the snap doesn’t match any official upstream I can find… SHA1 Snap ba16ce2958119a238d7931e709f30e932938218f Xenial (tor_0.2.7.6-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb) 997b717acaf2077708beba39a05adb30c014dfb2 Debian Jessie

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

We have 2016 not 1950. Update your ntp server. > assault/abuse/exploitation. The western culture we have collectively > created, where women are the lesser equals, and this underlining tone of > male arrogance that if a women was sexually abused/exploited that she > wanted it, was looking for

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 05:33:43PM +0200, Jan Vidar Krey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016, at 16:43, Aeris wrote: > > > 2) security is better > > > > Sorry to say that, but : no. It’s very weaker than plain old Debian > > package. > > > > This is a matter of perspective on the "security"

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

Hi, I'm a white-boy from a silly-old-town. I would like to express my perspective on the sexual assault/abuse/exploitation. The western culture we have collectively created, where women are the lesser equals, and this underlining tone of male arrogance that if a women was sexually

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> This is a matter of perspective on the "security" definition. Yep of course :P For desktop-purpose, snap can eventually be interresting. You only put yourself at risk. For server-purpose, you also put your users at risk, and in case of Tor, it’s very safer for them to run Tor with at least

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear team, Speaking as a former Tor board member and as a relay and bridge node operator, I'm more confident in Tor than ever before. I'm pleased with the new leadership team as well as the direction of the Tor Project. I'm pleased with the careful

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016, at 16:43, Aeris wrote: > > 2) security is better > > Sorry to say that, but : no. It’s very weaker than plain old Debian > package. > This is a matter of perspective on the "security" definition. The snaps does run in a separate container group, so it does have some more

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> 2) security is better Sorry to say that, but : no. It’s very weaker than plain old Debian package. Currently, your snap embeds : libevent openssl pthreads libasan2 libubsan python 2.7 python-torctl tor-arm tor Any

[tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

tl;dr: $ sudo apt install snapd; sudo snap install tor-middle-relay Hi. Ubuntu has been working on a new kind of software package* that aims for isolation from the rest of the system, so 1) anyone can create packages for others without review, 2) security is better, and 3) it can be the

[tor-relays] Tor not running since last Debian update

Hi So I think 2 days ago I updated tor on my debian stable machine and since then it's seen as not running anymore. It should be a relay. And locally it doesn't listen on port 9050, so it's not even a client now. My torrc hasn't changed. What's going on? Any config changes I missed? thanks