Re: [tor-relays] Node families and guard flags

> On 16 Sep 2016, at 07:58, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > I have made some measurements. Downloading large files through Tor did > not appear to show significant differences between both nodes, which > could mean that Tor clients are either capped in general or the

Re: [tor-relays] Node families and guard flags

I have made some measurements. Downloading large files through Tor did not appear to show significant differences between both nodes, which could mean that Tor clients are either capped in general or the circuits were overall not fast enough to make my nodes reach their limits. I also tried

Re: [tor-relays] Guard/Middle/Exit Hosting

No idea. This is the first promo code I've used. On Sep 15, 2016 3:54 PM, "Jason Jung" wrote: > Maybe we are limited to only one promo code of that nature? I used > DIVEIN10 about two years ago and using LOWENDBOX says "Sorry, this promo > cannot be applied to your account. Most

Re: [tor-relays] Guard/Middle/Exit Hosting

Maybe we are limited to only one promo code of that nature? I used DIVEIN10 about two years ago and using LOWENDBOX says "Sorry, this promo cannot be applied to your account. Most promos are valid for new customers only." Tristan: > It's in the billing settings after you log in. > > On Sep 15,

Re: [tor-relays] Guard/Middle/Exit Hosting

That code only works with new registrations. On September 15, 2016 3:28:19 PM CDT, Ralph Seichter wrote: >On 15.09.16 21:43, Markus Koch wrote: > >> DigitalOcean has a new Promo: $15 free aka 3 months free droplet. > >I have tried creating an additional Droplet, but

Re: [tor-relays] Guard/Middle/Exit Hosting

Thanks! Going on 2 months with an exit node. I had to disable SSH after about a month, but that's the only complaint I've gotten. On Sep 15, 2016 2:43 PM, "Markus Koch" wrote: Just 2 let you know, DigitalOcean has a new Promo: $15 free aka 3 months free droplet.

[tor-relays] Guard/Middle/Exit Hosting

Just 2 let you know, DigitalOcean has a new Promo: $15 free aka 3 months free droplet. Guard/Middle is no problem at all. My exits have been kicked after around 4 months (too many abuse mails :( ) Promocode: LOWENDBOX https://lowendbox.com/blog/september-hosting-vps-coupon-round-up/ I do not

Re: [tor-relays] Node families and guard flags

On 15.09.16 21:21, Green Dream wrote: > The Advertised Bandwidth is is significantly lower on TorRelay02HORUS > too. Indeed, even though bandwitdh settings are identical on both nodes: BandwidthRate 96 MBytes BandwidthBurst 112 MBytes Arm shows me that node #1 has upload/download of around

Re: [tor-relays] Node families and guard flags

The Advertised Bandwidth is is significantly lower on TorRelay02HORUS too. Let me quote teor from another recent thread, I think the same info is helpful here: -- begin quote -- Your relay reports a bandwidth based on the amount of traffic it has sustained in any 10 second period over the past

Re: [tor-relays] Node families and guard flags

On 15.09.16 20:57, Roman Mamedov wrote: > You should post both fingerprint or even just Atlas links directly, > maybe someone will have more ideas on why this could happen. 1) https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/0C3D5E19E3C75B505C8ACD26F89DCA2DF970553E 2)

Re: [tor-relays] Node families and guard flags

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:34:54 +0200 Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 15.09.16 19:43, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > > It is normal to run multiple nodes in one family and have most or all > > of them get the Guard flag. > > I don't see this happen. I would think that weeks of

Re: [tor-relays] Node families and guard flags

On 15.09.16 19:43, Roman Mamedov wrote: > It is normal to run multiple nodes in one family and have most or all > of them get the Guard flag. I don't see this happen. I would think that weeks of uninterrupted uptime should mean both nodes qualify, but only one has a guard flag. The nodes are on

Re: [tor-relays] Node families and guard flags

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 19:39:07 +0200 Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 15.09.2016 18:40, Markus Koch wrote: > > > 100% normal. Welcome to tor. > > No, no clue why ;) > > I was contemplating possible security considerations behind this. One > particular person or organization

Re: [tor-relays] Node families and guard flags

On 15.09.2016 18:40, Markus Koch wrote: > 100% normal. Welcome to tor. > No, no clue why ;) I was contemplating possible security considerations behind this. One particular person or organization responsible for the administration of multiple guards, when guards are sensitive because users

Re: [tor-relays] Node families and guard flags

100% normal. Welcome to tor. No, no clue why ;) Markus Sent from my iPad > On 15 Sep 2016, at 18:12, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > When running two non-exit nodes, configured as a single family with no > other members, and using identical bandwidth settings, is it to

[tor-relays] Node families and guard flags

When running two non-exit nodes, configured as a single family with no other members, and using identical bandwidth settings, is it to be expected that only one of the nodes ever obtains the guard flag? The node uptimes are pretty much the same as well, but consensus weight differs significantly.

Re: [tor-relays] list of bridges

Ivan Semenov: > Hello, can I get some vanilla bridges pls Go to https://bridges.torproject.org/ and select 'none' as Pluggable Transport. Voila. -- Ivan Markin ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

[tor-relays] list of bridges

Hello, can I get some vanilla bridges pls ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays