Re: [tor-relays] most (>57% cwfr) of the tor network still vulnerable to CVE-2016-8860 - update your relay!

2016-10-25 Thread Juuso Lapinlampi
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:48:00PM +, nusenu wrote: > It is not possible to reliable determine the exact CW fraction > affected[1] due to the fact that patches were released that didn't > increase tor's version number. In the case of OpenBSD, MTier published a binary package (patch) only

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

2016-10-25 Thread teor
> On 26 Oct. 2016, at 10:31, Mirimir wrote: > >> Any particular reason to let the mailing list know you have useful >> information but not share it here and make it available for future >> list archive searches? ;-) > > I'm assuming that the list doesn't accept attachments

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

2016-10-25 Thread Mirimir
On 10/25/2016 03:39 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 25.10.2016 09:58, Mirimir wrote: > >> OK, I've emailed you. > > Any particular reason to let the mailing list know you have useful > information but not share it here and make it available for future > list archive searches? ;-) I'm assuming

[tor-relays] most (>57% cwfr) of the tor network still vulnerable to CVE-2016-8860 - update your relay!

2016-10-25 Thread nusenu
just a reminder since most of the tor network (including some of the biggest operators) still runs vulnerable relays https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-0289-released-important-fixes Since 2/3 directory authorities removed most vulnerable versions from their 'recommended versions' you should

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

2016-10-25 Thread diffusae
I am interested too. It would be nice, if you can share it. Thanks a lot On 25.10.2016 08:49, Petrusko wrote: > Absolutely interested ! with pleasure :) > Will it be a link, or a file...? if you prefer sending it directly to > this mail address... > > Thx in advance ;) > > > Mirimir : >> I

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-10-25 Thread teor
> On 25 Oct. 2016, at 22:26, D.S. Ljungmark wrote: > > So, Now I've taken some steps to adjust the state of the relay, and > try to balance this. > > To reiterate a point previously, before I start adding more tor > daemons or servers to this, I want to know how to scale

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-10-25 Thread Volker Mink
Apart from your topic - what kind of internet connection do you use? :D   Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2016 um 13:26 Uhr Von: "D.S. Ljungmark" An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay So, Now I've taken some steps to adjust

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

2016-10-25 Thread Petrusko
Right, it's so easy and quick to duplicate a SD card with this hardware, by only unplugging it from the board... If it's not stored under your bed, it can be useful :p And 2nd, it can be a cool challenge to make it working ? To understand how those security softwares and how to config them nicely

Re: [tor-relays] Rampup speed of Exit relay

2016-10-25 Thread D.S. Ljungmark
So, Now I've taken some steps to adjust the state of the relay, and try to balance this. To reiterate a point previously, before I start adding more tor daemons or servers to this, I want to know how to scale and optimise what is already there. - Set up unbound in cache mode rather than use our

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

2016-10-25 Thread teor
> On 25 Oct. 2016, at 21:16, Toralf Förster wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 10/25/2016 12:03 PM, Duncan Guthrie wrote: >> >> Having it encrypted also makes remote management an absolute pain. > Depends on - an encrypted ext4fs needs

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

2016-10-25 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/25/2016 12:03 PM, Duncan Guthrie wrote: > > Having it encrypted also makes remote management an absolute pain. Depends on - an encrypted ext4fs needs just to be decrypted after boot as I tried in [1]. And the use case is to avoid that the

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

2016-10-25 Thread Duncan Guthrie
Hi folks, I am not sure it is more secure. What are we trying to protect here? As long as the relay is running,it is unencrypted. Disk encryption only prevents physical access - are you at risk of this? At any rate, the relay shouldn't be storing personal data. Having it encrypted also

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

2016-10-25 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 25.10.2016 09:58, Mirimir wrote: > OK, I've emailed you. Any particular reason to let the mailing list know you have useful information but not share it here and make it available for future list archive searches? ;-) -Ralph ___ tor-relays mailing

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

2016-10-25 Thread Mirimir
On 10/25/2016 12:49 AM, Petrusko wrote: > Absolutely interested ! with pleasure :) > Will it be a link, or a file...? if you prefer sending it directly to > this mail address... > > Thx in advance ;) OK, I've emailed you. > Mirimir : >> I have a how-to guide, if you're interested. > > > >

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

2016-10-25 Thread Petrusko
Absolutely interested ! with pleasure :) Will it be a link, or a file...? if you prefer sending it directly to this mail address... Thx in advance ;) Mirimir : > I have a how-to guide, if you're interested. -- Petrusko EBE23AE5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature