Re: [tor-relays] asymmetry in connections

> On 19 Dec. 2016, at 17:03, Ivan Markin wrote: > > teor: >> It takes about a week for a TLS connection to close if there is >> traffic on it, or a few minutes if there is no traffic: > ... >> Old TLS connections in tor are marked not to be used for new circuits >> after 7 days

Re: [tor-relays] asymmetry in connections

teor: > It takes about a week for a TLS connection to close if there is > traffic on it, or a few minutes if there is no traffic: ... > Old TLS connections in tor are marked not to be used for new circuits > after 7 days in connection_or_group_set_badness_. Thanks for the clarification! Though I

Re: [tor-relays] asymmetry in connections

> On 17 Dec. 2016, at 06:19, Ivan Markin wrote: > >o TLS connection is not going to terminate if no circuits left on it* > > [*] I may be wrong about it. It holds true from my experience. It takes about a week for a TLS connection to close if there is traffic on it, or

Re: [tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

> On 19 Dec. 2016, at 05:56, root wrote: > > On 28.11.2016 00:01, teor wrote: >> (I've rearranged your threads for clarity, please bottom-post in future.) On Nov 27, 2016 11:59 AM, "root" > wrote: It is end 2016

Re: [tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

On 28.11.2016 00:01, teor wrote: (I've rearranged your threads for clarity, please bottom-post in future.) On Nov 27, 2016 11:59 AM, "root" > wrote: It is end 2016 we should change from must have IPv4 to must have IPv6 and can have IPv4.

Re: [tor-relays] Cloning a relay - duplicate fingerprint

Issue solved, thank you guys ! 2016-12-18 0:28 GMT+01:00 Ivan Markin : > anondroid: > > Out of curiosity, I wonder how the Tor network handles this? Do the > > directory authorities drop one (or both) from the consensus? > > There are no "two" relays for one fingerprint since