Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Rana wrote: > If there is such a wiki I will be happy to submit my reports, I am not aware > of one. Please see and contribute to the following... https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/HardwarePerformanceCompendium > Also,

Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily update required

pa011: > How can I best find out which ones bring me on your second one? - search for your all your relays on atlas.torproject.org. - open every of your relays in a new tab - look for orange colored family members (they represent misconfigured/asymmetric configurations) if there are none,

[tor-relays] potentially_dangerous_relaygroups explained

> thanks for your great work - lets assume for a second I would be with > several relays on both of you lists: > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ornetstats/stats/master/o/main_exit_operators.txt > > >

Re: [tor-relays] snaptor relays: MyFamily update required

Np - it was an issue with my update script ;-) Cheers Mark B Snaptor.co.uk (non commercial) > On 22 Dec 2016, at 23:03, nusenu wrote: > > thanks for fixing it! > > +---+---+ > | nickname | MyFamilyCount | >

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 71, Issue 93

Thank you! That was already the answer. :) You will not see anything in logs until this value isn't good and was adjusted by tor. For details, see compute_real_max_mem_in_queues() function in /src/or/config.c. Cheers, Patrice ___ tor-relays mailing

Re: [tor-relays] Is AES-NI enabled in tor?

Please don't mix multiple questions into one thread. Sorry, my bad. Tor does not implement crypto itself (mostly) and relies on a cryptolibrary (which is OpenSSL/LibreSSL/etc) instead. Thus you should check if AES-NI is enabled in your cryptolibrary. An excerpt from StackOverflow answer [1]

Re: [tor-relays] snaptor relays: MyFamily update required

thanks for fixing it! +---+---+ | nickname | MyFamilyCount | +---+---+ | SnapExitBULG | 10. | | SnapExitMOLD | 10. | | SnapExitUS| 10. | | SnapTorBANG | 10. | | SnapTorCAN| 10. | |

Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily update required

Hi nusenu, thanks for your great work - lets assume for a second I would be with several relays on both of you lists: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ornetstats/stats/master/o/main_exit_operators.txt

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

If there is such a wiki I will be happy to submit my reports, I am not aware of one. Also, based on this thread the people who may take action and decisions seem to be convinced that home relays are of no or very little use to Tor. For this reason, whether they are right or not, I am not sure

Re: [tor-relays] Is MaxMemInQueues recognized my tor? (was: A Question about aes-ni and the use of RAM.)

Patrice: > And my other question is, does tor recognize this option? >> MaxMemInQueues 7000 MByte It does, see the man page or the source code. > Because I see nothing in the logs. > I am not 100% sure but I think tor gave a feedback when I used this > option in the earlier versions. You will

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Rana wrote: > A 20 mbps Pi relay has been reported here, still under-utilized. All these reports of this or that made in piles of random email ... serves no one past the typical few day participant convos. So please people... submit all

Re: [tor-relays] Is AES-NI enabled in tor? (was: A Question about aes-ni and the use of RAM)

Please don't mix multiple questions into one thread. Patrice: > does anyone know if the aes-ni support of the motherboard is used by > default? (I saw nothing in the logs.) Tor does not implement crypto itself (mostly) and relies on a cryptolibrary (which is OpenSSL/LibreSSL/etc) instead. Thus

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

-Original Message- From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of David Serrano Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 7:36 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP On 2016-12-22

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

On 2016-12-22 19:24:25 (+0200), Rana wrote: > > 2. "Residential lines in particular ... hardware caves when too many > connections are open in parallel" - this appears to be plain incorrect. [...] > ith 1300 simultaneous connections. His statement is right. 1300 connections are not a lot. I

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

@Sebastian, Thank you for the detailed presentation of your arguments against the use of residential relays. While many (probably most) of the points you made are convincing and, coming from a DirAuth operator, difficult for me to contest, I would like to refer to those of them that seem to be

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

Hi there, I am one of the directory authority operators, so while I don't claim to know what the collective community wants, I am one of the people who are asked to make these decisions. > On 22 Dec 2016, at 10:25, Rana wrote: > > So my question to the community is as

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

pussy 2016年12月22日 17:59，"Rana" 写道： > @Andreas > ... > >> I realize there could be pros and contras. Among the contras there > could be (for example) many small relays overloading the dirauths. I would > like to hear more about the contras. > >A Pi running at its line

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

@Andreas ... >> I realize there could be pros and contras. Among the contras there could be >> (for example) many small relays overloading the dirauths. I would like to >> hear more about the contras. >A Pi running at its line speed isn't exactly a small relay. Of course it isn't. A 20 mbps Pi

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:25:11 +, Rana wrote: ... > I realize there could be pros and contras. Among the contras there could be > (for example) many small relays overloading the dirauths. I would like to > hear more about the contras. A Pi running at its line speed isn't exactly a small

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

@Patrice: Yes both relays started with brand new identities and the one that is now clinically dead (nickname ZG0) has been wiped out and restarted with a new fingerprint AND a new IP address as I have a dynamic one and I rebooted my router to get a new one). Did not help, so obviously this