On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:12:46 +1100
teor wrote:
> Your relay also does not seem capable of handling much tor traffic, so
> tor clients are being told not to use it:
That's the usual problem of relays in Asia (Singapore in this case), with all
the bandwidth measuring authority servers being too fa
> On 29 Jan 2017, at 05:16, Jonathan Baker-Bates
> wrote:
>
> +1 on this as I've recently started running an obfs4 bridge for similar
> reasons as Prof. Hoffmann. Although arm seems to indicate I get very little
> traffic through it (avg 50Kb/sec).
Give it time, bridges take a while to be di
> On 30 Jan 2017, at 14:35, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:03:40PM +1100, teor wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please send us your actual torrc:
>
> that's my actual torrc, I've only edited HashedControlPassword
Then please reload your torrc so that your tor process is usi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:03:40PM +1100, teor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please send us your actual torrc:
that's my actual torrc, I've only edited HashedControlPassword
> * your torrc has a DirPort, but your relay on atlas does not
> (this might be because you have a bandwidth limit set)
> * your to
> a tor op :
> Hi
> When a tor admin updates a tor node, what is the reasoning for
> punishing the status by removing flags like the guard flag?
It's not a punishment, it's an advisory notice to clients not to choose
the relay as a guard (or HSDir, or relay for Stable circuits).
The Tor network
> On 27 Jan 2017, at 17:03, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I ran sorrentini [1] as a relay for a month or two and everything was
> fine.
>
> then 2-3 weeks ago i decided to allow exit, the traffic went down
> significantly, is that expected? it has recovered a bit but i feel the
>
> *should* be sorted now
thanks for fixing it!
+--++
| nickname | eMyFamilyCount |
+--++
| BrassHornRelay06 |17. |
| BrassHornExit03 |17. |
| BrassHornRelay16 |17. |
| BrassHornRelay14 |
see also:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/metrics-team/2017-January/000285.html
(probably where it belongs better)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.t
>> https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2015-10-22&end=2017-01-29&country=ae&events=off
less significant but also (IR):
https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2016-01-01&end=2017-01-29&country=ir&events=off
signature.asc
Description: Ope
No, still not back. BW reading back to normal though.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Updates removes status flags
Local Time: January 27, 2017 5:27 AM
UTC Time: January 27, 2017 5:27 AM
From: petru...@riseup.net
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Hey,
May be the
Excellent!
> On Jan 29, 2017, at 04:57, Felix wrote:
>
> Please check out
>
> https://
> metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2015-10-22&end=2017-01-29&country=ae&events=off
>
> vs
>
> https://
> metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2015-10-22&end=2
Please check out
https://
metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2015-10-22&end=2017-01-29&country=ae&events=off
vs
https://
metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2015-10-22&end=2017-01-29&country=all&events=off
--
I this cool or not?
12 matches
Mail list logo