Re: [tor-relays] Law Enforcement Request

2017-04-26 Thread tor
Could you share the verbiage you used to refuse the request? Or offer any general guidance for other guard operators in case they receive a similar request? I can imagine there may be certain jurisdictions where refusing such a request might be problematic. Also, are there any guidelines for

Re: [tor-relays] Law Enforcement Request

2017-04-26 Thread David Stainton
What was the guard discovery attack they used? Was it one of the well known published guard discovery attack or another new one? On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:58 AM, teor wrote: > Hi all, > > Last week, we were contacted by Australian law enforcement, on behalf of > German law

Re: [tor-relays] bind DNS Crash on Exit

2017-04-26 Thread Steve Snyder
That bug has been "fixed" in RHEL6/CentOS6 since the update on 20 Apr 2017 but the crashes still occur. As far as I can tell, all the "fix" did was move the assertion failure from resolver.c to validator.c. On 04/26/2017 02:19 AM, teor wrote: Hi all, Are you using bind as a local caching

[tor-relays] bind DNS Crash on Exit

2017-04-26 Thread teor
Hi all, Are you using bind as a local caching resolver on your exits? The DNS resolver on our exit crashed over the weekend due to this bug: https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01466 It hasn't been patched yet in Debian: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-3137 So I have added a