Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-09-29 Thread grarpamp
> Larger, faster relays help clients achieve low-latency, high bandwidth > connections. This may depend? Do we have a graph of actual headroom / saturation in the network of boxes versus consensus weight versus max box speed? Does weight back off below historically sensed saturation levels?

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-09-29 Thread teor
On 30 Sep 2017, at 09:55, Andy Isaacson wrote: >> Is it better if I run other small ones (100Mbps too) or only 1 big exit >> relay (1 Gbps) ? What's best for the network stability/security? > > My overall analysis is that one 1Gbps relay is a better contribution to the >

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-09-29 Thread Christopher
Hi IPonU, Thanks for running a relay. As I understand it, running one larger relay may be better. Traffic correlation attacks by a global persistent adversary might have a harder time due to the fact that more circuits are using one IP, rather than less circuits spread across multiple IPs. In no

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-09-29 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:37:00AM +0200, IPonU wrote: I'm already running a small exit node (100Mbps bandwidth) and I'm ready to spend more money on it, so have a question for you guys : Thanks for running a relay! Is it better if I run other small ones (100Mbps too) or only 1 big exit

Re: [tor-relays] bwauths doesn't reach reliable my relay

2017-09-29 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/29/2017 01:59 AM, teor wrote: > Do you have errors in your log no, except 1 or 2 few http errors for faharvar that a consensus upload failed or so. In the mean while I got a reasonable bw back. But b/c the were 3 "outages" within a week for

Re: [tor-relays] Info about HW Encryption on Raspberry

2017-09-29 Thread Sebastian Urbach
Hi, You could try to set the loglevel to "debug". As far as i can remember you should get that info when you restart the daemon. -- Sincerely yours / M.f.G. / Sincères salutations Sebastian Urbach --- Those who surrender

[tor-relays] Info about HW Encryption on Raspberry

2017-09-29 Thread Fr33d0m4all
Hi, I have a Raspberry Pi3 that runs a Tor mid-relay and I’ve noticed that in the last weeks it reaches high temperatures (about 76°C) due to high CPU usage when Tor traffic increases. It did not reach this temperature until this summer (but it is not due to an higher environment temperature),

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-09-29 Thread IPonU
I don't know if they accept foreign people to order (you could ask them by clicking on "Nous contacter ") The forum doesn't work in France either. I already asked them about tor exits and they told me they were OK with it as long it's not spamming and

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-09-29 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 29.09.2017 10:18, IPonU wrote: > http://www.digicube.fr/rapidserveurs DigiCube notes "Offre uniquement valable pour la France métropolitaine". Has anybody asked if non-French customers are also welcome? Have they agreed to hosting Tor nodes, especially exits? My French is rusty, and I could

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-09-29 Thread Tor Node Admin @ SechsNullDrei.org
Hi there, If your exit node has been online for more than two months with little hassle from the ISP, be sure to update the wiki at https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs with your exit node's ISP information. And thank you for your contribution to the Tor network.

[tor-relays] NTor

2017-09-29 Thread Sebastian Urbach
Dear List, I just noticed an increase from 670k to 8.8 million NTor handshakes. CPU load reached the limit and Consensus Weight dropped. Something is going around ... https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/4198BD138E5E11B15B05C826B427148CED7D99FE -- Sincerely yours / M.f.G. / Sincères

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-09-29 Thread IPonU
I'm not sure what you're asking so I'll show you the website : http://www.digicube.fr/rapidserveurs ATM I have the cheapest (4€). So i'm not sure if I take others or if I take only one at the top with 1Gbps bandwidth. I think it could be great to have multiple relays in case one is down but

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-09-29 Thread I
Putting relays where there aren't many now would be good for diversity. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] About relay size

2017-09-29 Thread John Ricketts
Hi, 100Mbps is not a small node. Thanks for running a relay! When you say you're going to spend more money on it... do you mean hardware or bandwidth? All of my relays are running as virtual machines on multiple computers to maximize the CPU and memory usage. If you didn't want to

[tor-relays] About relay size

2017-09-29 Thread IPonU
Hi Tor list, I'm already running a small exit node (100Mbps bandwidth) and I'm ready to spend more money on it, so have a question for you guys : Is it better if I run other small ones (100Mbps too) or only 1 big exit relay (1 Gbps) ? What's best for the network stability/security ? Thanks